NL10z vs unknown delayed cbet-RR
Posted by TheAstiAsti
Posted by
TheAstiAsti
posted in
Low Stakes
NL10z vs unknown delayed cbet-RR
Blinds: $0.05/$0.10 (6 Players)
BN: $4.44
SB: $14.14
BB: $10.00 (Hero)
UTG: $15.50
MP: $20.58
CO: $11.22
SB: $14.14
BB: $10.00 (Hero)
UTG: $15.50
MP: $20.58
CO: $11.22
Preflop
($0.15)
Hero is BB with
A
T
, , ,
Flop
($0.49)
4
9
T
,
Turn
($0.49)
4
9
T
T
, , , ,
River
($4.49)
4
9
T
T
6
, ,
can't judge or rate vil , but after 20 hands his stats was kinda agro 37-32-14
OFC its only 20hands,but...
as played by him I see only slowplayed sets and random bluffs
sets vs OESD/Ahighbluffs ratio here???
Loading 3 Comments...
Weird river spot for sure. Slowplaying a set I guess is possible but I think it can also be like KT or QT as well. I ve called down in spots where I m pretty sure they can t raise worse trips for value then somehow they have. I would nt put him on many bluffs though once you call the 3bet.
yeah but main thing why he checked his Tx on T94r ?
It could be also random QQ-AA. so most likely overpair/bluffs/sets rather then Tx imo
Fwiw its theoretically correct to check Tx here at some frequency. I havent run these positions and board but in similar spots optimal c betting % is ~50% or so. Max 60%. Not saying that anyone plays optimally but theres definitely reason to believe that he s checking Tx some. Once he raises he should be polarized to Tx and some bluffs of some kind so overpairs are discounted for sure. But its 10nl. Anything is possible.
Be the first to add a comment