NL10Z QQ
Posted by dm0sky
Posted by
dm0sky
posted in
Low Stakes
NL10Z QQ
Blinds: $0.05/$0.10 (6 Players)
BN: $11.94 (Hero)
SB: $11.08
BB: $10.19
UTG: $13.50
MP: $3.31
CO: $34.08
SB: $11.08
BB: $10.19
UTG: $13.50
MP: $3.31
CO: $34.08
Preflop
($0.15)
Hero is BN with
Q
Q
, , , , , , ,
Flop
($4.46)
J
4
T
,
the fold feels weak tbh and the hand is very similar to https://www.runitonce.com/nlhe/nl10z-tt
Loading 5 Comments...
Dont get this tbh...what is your thought process here?
Flatting QQ pre is fine. But this is a good board for your hand and villains range. So i expect a somewhat high cbetting frequency from SB (expecpt ppl to cbet more than they should here on a monotone board).
So folding seems way to tight for me:
If we fold this flop, we should not call pre with QQ
you have to call flop having equity to improve and also blocking some flushes plus unblocking villains Ax/Kx spade combos...i'm not sure where the cutoff point is here for spade floats but Qs certainly makes the cut
Im pretty sure that basically anypair with a spade is a call in equilibrium. So im pretty sure that even vs a stronger 3betting range, we still will be calling whider than only QQ with a spade.
Or do i misunderstand? Not sure if folding like 88/99 with a spade should be the play at this stackdepth.
yeah QQ is 100% a call at equilibrium, i meant i'm not sure if every pp with a spade is given some do not have as good of removal against villain flushes like QQ/JJ/TT w/spade do...maybe they all call but it is a pretty large sizing for a monotone board
If you find it hard to play this post-flop make your decision easier by always 4betting QQ SBvsBU. Other than that, looks like a pretty easy call.
Be the first to add a comment