OTF:
Can you explain me why a CB makes your hand easier to play on later streets than a XC?
(In both cases you don’t beat his valuerange. He has more blufs OTT vs a XC line than when you CB. Therefore your EV should be higher (and playability better) OTT when you XC rather than CB)

OTT:
- What factors are important when estimating effectiveness of a XR OTT?
1. Strength of range villain OTT pre-betting (How is villain his range constructed? Frequency of TP+, Frequency of weak hands like floats)
2. Bet vs Missed CB (and agg%) OTT, the likelihood of him betting when checked to.
3. Stickyness vs XR (fold v XR, WTSD%, Does Hero perceivably represent value When XR OTT)
In general the more likely villain is to fastplay strong hands OTF, the lower the frequency of TP+ (And esp. 2P+) OTT. The less strong hands, the more effective your XR will be OTT and OTR.
The more likely villain is to BvMCB OTT, the lower the frequency of strong hands in his turn betting range, so the higher the FE tends to be.
The less inclined villain is to defend vs a XR without a strong hand naturally, and the more Hero represents value in the eyes of villain, the higher the FE OTT.

Were you to have TPTK+, XR is a strong option OTT when villain is likely to BvMCB with high frequency. and even more so when he is sticky vs a XR. The majority of villain his range will only call were you to CB OTT and now you can get an extra street of value in.
(Seeing the hand of villain he appears to be a perfect example of a player against who this works out great).

OTR:
- I agree the king is a better card for your range than for villain.
- Your big sizing is polarising, which is not neccessarily bad (It is conditional upon how wide your value XR range looks OTT and how wide villain will call OTT and OTR), but it seems to make your valuerange quite narrow. In my experience, people don’t often show QJo down in Hero his shoes.
- That said, I don’t think your river bluf in practice is bad versus population, it should be a profitable bluf and the best play, irrespective of sizing. Only with specific reads on the villain it could become a bad or even horrible play in my opinion.

Check flop or bet like 1/4 pot (checking much preferred). BvB He has all sets, 2 pair, straights, some overpair combos, some top pair combos, OESD's, gutters (which you completely unblock). Sucks getting raised here and folding when you can outdraw a bunch of the aforementioned hands with 3rd pair/TK on the cheap.

looks like river the best street you played in that hand. Quite bad flop for you, so we shoudn't be cbetting a lot (vs presumable decent opponent) and A4 is borderline cbet.
On the turn you've started marginal assumptive play - There are no much better cards for your range vs villain after flop on this runout. But I will agree Q is slightly better for you. However x/R not type of play we wanna be making, maybe x/c with it and x/raise with some FD or 5x to block straights.

I'm considering a check-raise on this flop.

For me, I just bet small on flop, barrel on turn and river since over card is better for our range. There is a ton of better hand we can for them to fold such as pocket pair or small pair on flop. I'm sure that A6o would not call when you barrel 3 street. And just fold when we get raised

The flop is very good for BB's range. You have to respect that fact. He also has the nut advantage.

I would take one of two lines here.

1. Check-call flop, check-fold turn.
2. Bet flop small for protection, barrel on turn because card is good for your range, check-fold river. River probably checks through here, and you lose a small pot.

As for how to tag the player, calling station obviously. The guy calls down with third pair. Take him to value town.