NL10z - bluffing vs weak (IMO) range
Posted by Nihil22
Posted by
Nihil22
posted in
Low Stakes
NL10z - bluffing vs weak (IMO) range
Blinds: $0.05/$0.10 (6 Players)
BN: $10.00
SB: $12.07 (Hero)
BB: $9.45
UTG: $24.29
MP: $10.00
CO: $28.12
SB: $12.07 (Hero)
BB: $9.45
UTG: $24.29
MP: $10.00
CO: $28.12
Preflop
($0.15)
Hero is SB with
4
A
, ,
Flop
($0.60)
7
6
4
,
Im thinking and to be honest im not sure if i should cbet this flop or play check-call.Cbet makes it easier to play on later streets, check-call seems to be more difficult option.
Turn
($1.24)
7
6
4
Q
, , ,
Here i was trying to be fancy and tricky (it finished as usual :-) ), Q seems to be much better in my range than his, and in his range are mostly weak pairs, 7x 6x, 4x, or draws 5x, maybe 89, T9. Thought that i can win it now by check-raising and when he decides to call me, he will definetly fold to river bet.
River
($5.12)
7
6
4
Q
K
,
K seems to be the best card for me, ill have a lot of AK, KQ in my range. If he floated me on flop with some Qx, and hit his Q on turn, now its gonna be not easy for him to call my shove on river. I did as I decided, shoved and he called me kinda insta.
Final Pot
SB
lost and shows a pair of Fours.
BB wins and shows a pair of Sixes.
BB wins $18.05
Rake is $0.85
BB wins and shows a pair of Sixes.
BB wins $18.05
Rake is $0.85
He showed me A6o and now Im thinking how should i tag him. As a passive recreational who calls dawn with 4th pair or use red color cause he seems to be good in hand reading and its better not to make moves on him. How do you think?
Loading 7 Comments...
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.
This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.