NL10z - AA river decision.
Posted by mikkelkm92
Posted by
mikkelkm92
posted in
Low Stakes
NL10z - AA river decision.
Blinds: $0.05/$0.10 (6 Players)
BN: $12.36
SB: $10.20
BB: $9.63
UTG: $10.57
MP: $10.80 (Hero)
CO: $4.51
SB: $10.20
BB: $9.63
UTG: $10.57
MP: $10.80 (Hero)
CO: $4.51
Preflop
($0.15)
Hero is MP with
A
A
, , , , ,
Flop
($0.95)
5
5
Q
, , ,
Turn
($2.60)
5
5
Q
6
, , ,
River
($5.40)
5
5
Q
6
5
,
Normally i don't use overbets at all, but came across this spot and found it quite interesting in that regard and i'm interested in hearing what you would do in this spot and why.
I decided to overbet because i thought that the btn had none 5's in his range and that he where most likely to hold the Q which most likely would pay me off.
Maybe standard spot, a bit rusty.
Loading 7 Comments...
This is ok, i mean u have literally no bluffs here. But is a fine exploitative bet
Edit: Misread the board here, i like the jam here nice spot to overbet.
Well played. I especially dig the flop and turn sizings. Don't think you ought to go big on those streets when the BB is likely to have way more 5x+ than you do.
The river is player dependent. Versus fun player this must be best, versus competent player I am not a fan at all.
This line seems fine, you are going to have KK-AA and a 5 more frequent than your opponent. Blocking the A5s combo makes this hand extra strong.
Blocking AQ matters less since QT=AQ on this river, and AK would be a prime candidate for bluffing here.
For balance you should mix up your play. For instance checkcalling the flop or going smaller for value with other AA combos (that don't block A5s).
Isn't blocking AA and A5s a thing with AQ so that AQ>>QT ?
AQ also blocks bluffs when you use AK to bluff here, so no:
Thanks for the response! Unfortunately vill had 66 in this situation.
Be the first to add a comment