nl100z shove vs cb
Posted by Jeff_
Posted by
Jeff_
posted in
Low Stakes
nl100z shove vs cb
Blinds: $0.50/$1.00 (6 Players)
BN: $108.32 (Hero)
SB: $143.94
BB: $68.82
UTG: $113.70
MP: $93.12
CO: $38.49
SB: $143.94
BB: $68.82
UTG: $113.70
MP: $93.12
CO: $38.49
Preflop
($1.50)
Hero is BN with
T
Q
, , , ,
Flop
($7.50)
6
3
Q
, ,
28/17 rec)few hands only). He gives me 42% equity
What your calling range would be?
Loading 9 Comments...
From my experience, mega fish like this dude love to limp call all kinds of junk and quite frequently all kinds of Ax too. Then as soon as they hit a pair they love to just shove all their money in as quickly as possible, not to mention the occasional bluff. Sometimes they like to slow play QQ-AA preflop and then play them mega aggressive on the flop so its possible. But its more possible this guy has Q2-KQ, A6, 76 sometimes even TT 99 88 ect. I may be wrong but im never folding top pair good kicker against these guys. I've given up trying to work out their thought processes :) I would probably call up to Q8 here
What did he show up with?
I folded
On a such dry board, I'd fold this.
Gross spot.
Without info I'm probably calling with AQ or KQ maybe.
If you have notes of bad playing, then we can even call lighter with 99+, probably...
Hey Jeff I think you made a good fold here but what was your reason for raising to 3bb preflop? Do you have a specific plan for your post flop play against 30-40bb short stacks? Do you have history with this player type at your site?
Good question, no history with this player. But in zoom tables in generally I tend to see lim/raise line more often (because games are agressive and rec faced raise so often),
He is under 40bb that means I don't want to be raising big : 2,5bb seems small - 4BB seems little big (close to what I want), however I didnt check that BB is likely weak, that means I can go 4BB here instead of 3BB, vs regs I'll go 3x because of 3 bet opportunity.
I don't know your BTN ISO range, but I would check this flop. I don't like betting top pair marginal kicker, and the board is pretty dry.
What about developing a calling range in this spot? Yes we do leave ourselves open to being squeezed but in this position we should naturally have a very wide calling range against the blinds anyway. Even if you tighten up your calling range your still going to be way ahead of CO limping range as well as say SB's squeezing range if they tend to aggression and squeeze too wide.
Thoughts?
I don't know if it's optimal, but I do have a small limp behind range on the BTN and the SB. However, I usually do it when UTG limps, because UTG limp range tends to be much stronger and thus I have to be tighter with an ISO range. When CO open limps, I usually just ISO raise with most of my range.
On the BTN my limp behind range is some small pairs, small suited connectors and occasionally stuff like K4s. SB limp behind range is much wider, because of the much better pot odds and less risk of being squeezed.
In any case, QTs is much too strong to limp behind. Much better to ISO raise.
Be the first to add a comment