NL100::call turn shove w 99?
Posted by Deactivated User
Posted by
Deactivated User
posted in
Low Stakes
NL100::call turn shove w 99?
BB: $52.43
HJ: $60.05
CO: $206.60
BN: $72.37
SB: $100 (Hero)
HJ: $60.05
CO: $206.60
BN: $72.37
SB: $100 (Hero)
Preflop
($1.50)
(5 Players)
Hero was dealt
9
9
HJ raises to $3, CO folds, BN folds, Hero calls $2.50, BB folds
HJ raises to $3, CO folds, BN folds, Hero calls $2.50, BB folds
Flop
($7.00)
7
6
4
(2 Players)
Hero checks,
HJ bets $6,
Hero raises to $18,
HJ calls $12
Turn
($43.00)
7
6
4
3
(2 Players)
Hero checks,
HJ raises to $39.05, and is all in,
Hero calls $39.05
River
($121.10)
7
6
4
3
A
(2 Players)
Final Pot
villain is 33/20/2.
i feel willing to felt that flop for 60 BB; is that a leak?
is felting that flop for 100 BB a leak?
on the turn, i need 32% equity to call.
against a range of {66-33,As8s,A7s,As5s,As4s,As3s,As2s,KcQc,KsQs,KsJs,KsTs,Ks9s,Ks8s,QsJs,QsTs,Qs9s,Qs8s,JsTs,Js9s,97s+,87s,65s,54s,A5o}, 99 has 33% equity. of course, that assumes villain never 4b shoves with any of those spade combinations on the flop, or with 66/33 for that matter. [i left 77 out, as i figure that most sets would realistically have gotten it in on the flop.]
also, villain would probably be more willing to take a free turn card with draws, making it more likely that a turn shove represents a straight, yea?
Loading 3 Comments...
Not a fan of a c/r here OTF. What worse is going to be getting it in often enough vs you? 88, A7s? Then you consider the fact that theres a significant amount of bad runouts. 8,3, any spade to start.
C/f turn I think although its kinda sick as he should nt have many 5x combos which makes me somewhat inclined to call. Its just that I don t think he should expect you to fold a set.
Why do you turn a value hand into a bluff? He folds his air and continues with hands that beat you, except 88 and A7s, like WM2K mentioned.
check-calling is the best option by far.
pretty fucking gross...
Be the first to add a comment