NL100 tptk AK vs aggression from 3bet-coldcaller in SB
Posted by Anom1c
Posted by
Anom1c
posted in
Low Stakes
NL100 tptk AK vs aggression from 3bet-coldcaller in SB
Blinds: $0.50/$1.00 (5 Players)
SB: $163.56
BB: $149.21
UTG: $113.71
CO: $70.66
BN: $231.92 (Hero)
BB: $149.21
UTG: $113.71
CO: $70.66
BN: $231.92 (Hero)
Preflop
($1.50)
Hero is BN with
K
A
, , , , ,
CO is fish, SB is 28/20/8.5 reg
Flop
($25.00)
A
7
8
, , , ,
Betting for protection and value from fish and maybe some T9s/AQ from the reg
Turn
($48.74)
A
7
8
T
, , ,
Board gets scarier but I don't want to give freecards. when the reg raises it gets more complicated, can I fold AK here? I think my calling range is basically only AA if I fold this
River
($132.74)
A
7
8
T
3
,
Pot odds...
Final Pot
SB
wins and shows three of a kind, Eights.
BN lost and shows a pair of Aces.
SB wins $202.86
Rake is $3.00
BN lost and shows a pair of Aces.
SB wins $202.86
Rake is $3.00
What can I expect the reg's range to be when he CC a 3b OOP? We're pretty deep with a fish in the pot
Loading 3 Comments...
i'd xb ott. Not to be results oriented,but we never have 3streets of value anyway/we dont have that many bluffsI think and he has all sets in his range. As played def. bF ott.
I think checking back the turn could be ok here. Betting is ok too but I would size up to something like half pot and not bet this small. I'm not exactly trying to induce raises here and when he does raise I don't want in the back of my mind that I bet like 30% pot (something I would never do with anything better than 1 pair). You know what I mean like, I don't want to telegraph my hand strength this deep in a 3bp. Betting 24 then just checking back the river seems better also when he raises a more standard bet size I think we can feel more comfortable letting it go.
Some regs CC with an uncapped range here because they wants to play vs fish and not isolate vs you; something like a depolarized strong range. OR range and your 3bet range can change this scenario.
Be the first to add a comment