NL100 bluffcatching top pair vs unexpected turn xr
Posted by Resolve
Posted by
Resolve
posted in
Low Stakes
NL100 bluffcatching top pair vs unexpected turn xr
Blinds: $0.50/$1.00 (5 Players)
SB: $134.18
BB: $53.09
UTG: $105.01 (Hero)
CO: $123.77
BN: $111.47
BB: $53.09
UTG: $105.01 (Hero)
CO: $123.77
BN: $111.47
Preflop
($1.50)
Hero is UTG with
T
A
, , , ,
Flop
($10.00)
9
A
6
, ,
It isn't strong enough to for 3 streets of value. I would bet AQ+ and draws here.
Turn
($10.00)
9
A
6
6
, , , ,
Delayed cbet seems ok here, I think I have more sixes than the other players and AA is also in my range. Can get value from worse aces and draws. I'm thinking the SB won't have a 6 often and could have decided to play a draw aggressively because my range looks a bit weak because I checked the flop.
River
($50.00)
9
A
6
6
Q
,
This is pretty close imo, called because I think he is weighted towards missed draws. What does this sizing mean in this spot? Looks like 99 that went for a xr instead of leading OTT or a missed draw.
Final Pot
SB
wins and shows three of a kind, Sixes.
UTG lost and shows two pairs, Aces and Sixes.
SB wins $142.00
Rake is $3.00
UTG lost and shows two pairs, Aces and Sixes.
SB wins $142.00
Rake is $3.00
What do you do OTR?
Would you have played the hand differently on an earlier street?
Loading 5 Comments...
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.
This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.