NL100 BBvsBU xr and all in bluff
Posted by Resolve
Posted by
Resolve
posted in
Low Stakes
NL100 BBvsBU xr and all in bluff
Blinds: $0.50/$1.00 (6 Players)
CO: $100.00
BN: $181.24
SB: $115.25
BB: $106.50 (Hero)
UTG: $120.14
MP: $236.21
BN: $181.24
SB: $115.25
BB: $106.50 (Hero)
UTG: $120.14
MP: $236.21
Preflop
($1.50)
Hero is BB with
J
7
, , ,
Flop
($6.50)
T
6
9
, , ,
I don't x/r enough when I'm defending my BB against steals, this looked like a good hand to bluff.
Turn
($36.02)
T
6
9
5
,
I'm pretty inexperienced with this but this is an ok turn to barrel I think. I think sets would shove sometimes here so I'm planning to shove non-spade/K rivers.
River
($87.34)
T
6
9
5
2
,
Really not sure what I'm doing but it worked out.
Final Pot
BB wins $84.34
Rake is $3.00
Rake is $3.00
Is this fine to do sometimes or is it just a crazy spew?
Oh and what turns and rivers should I (not) barrel?
Loading 13 Comments...
hey,
My strategy with nutty hands here is mixed between donkbetting and x/r, it's kind of good option imo, but it means that I dont have so many nuts in x/r range -> so many bluffs.
Anyway, I dont like x/r with this hand, even if you x/r all your nuts OTF (dont have DB range) I still think that it's way too wide. I'd rather choose some hands with BD FD f.e. hand with high spade + GS or GS + heart BDFD etc. imo you can find enough this type of hands and you dont have to x/r this board with pure gs. Look at villains play as well, he looks quite strong cbetting on this texture vs 2guys.
It's heads up. I agree that just a gutshot might not be enough equity to barrel turn, but it's not that easy to find enough bluffs with more equity.
Let's say I raise all straights for value. I have 87(16) so I can have 32 bluffs OTF. I prefer some straight blocking hands that are too weak to call. If they have to have a BDFD too then these are the bluffs I find:
Ah8h, Kh8h, Qh8h, Ah7h, Kh7h, Qh7h, Jh7h, 8h6h, 7h6h, 8h5h, 7h5h, 7h4h, As8d, As8h, As8c, Ks8d, Ks8h, Ks8c, Qs8d, Qs8h, Qs8c (21)
Still need 11 more so let's raise BP+BDFD too:
Ah6h, As6d, As6h, As6c, Kh6h, Qh6h, Jh6h, 6h5h, 6h4h (9)
Now I still don't have enough, so let's add some combodraws that can continue against a flop 3bet:
Jh8h, Js8s, Js7s (3)
Do you like this range? I'm going to see what Pio does, will post screenshots.
EDIT: It was a 3bb open so I don't have many of the hands I listed above.
!updated with the correct pics. This makes a lot more sense, lol.
So apparently my hand is just a fold :)
Wow, that seems sick, can anyone give a breakdown of how they would adjust that to the low stakes player pool?
I'm guessing generally tighter value ranges on turn, with similar river and flop ranges? I like the QT bet, although not entirely sure.
On that board it's not too unsurprising that BB's range is stronger right, more overpairs and nut fd's, oesd's, marginally set combos too?
Its pretty obvious that there is something wrong with this simulation, IP can't get away with cbetting entire range on this board, regardless of donk betting being enabled or not. All the other ranges depend on the cbetting range so the entire sim is useless in my opinion
OP probably selected "force OOP check/IP Bet" in the tree building...
Yeah I did select force OOP check. I don't know why IP bets his whole range...
I never donkbet unless it's multiway.
Because you forced it to do it. It seems like you are not very familiar with Pio, but when you selected this you force OOP to check everything and IP to bet everything. Dont use that unless you have a specific reason to
Oops... thanks for pointing that out.
Will update with correct screenies after my session.
I like the bluff on this particular runout, but I don't know if I like this combo. I prefer some combo with a spade at least.
Actually, environments are too weak-tight xD
Updated with the correct version. Saulo saves the day!
nice screen, thanks! I didnt expect that PIO dont like xr 2pairs here. But maybe theres some sense :)
Be the first to add a comment