NL100 Backraise jam vs. Pro Shortstacker
Posted by bdon22
Posted by
bdon22
posted in
Low Stakes
NL100 Backraise jam vs. Pro Shortstacker
BN: $106.32
SB: $48.60
BB: $105.24
UTG: $59.61
HJ: $208.93
CO: $143.47 (Hero)
SB: $48.60
BB: $105.24
UTG: $59.61
HJ: $208.93
CO: $143.47 (Hero)
MP has been min-opening a lot of hands. Seems like a reg with a wide pre-flop opening range. MP is 35/29 with a F3B of 75%
SB is a pro shortstacker quite aggro 34/28 with a 3-bet of 11.1% and squeeze of 25% over a smallish sample.
SB is a pro shortstacker quite aggro 34/28 with a 3-bet of 11.1% and squeeze of 25% over a smallish sample.
Preflop
($1.50)
(6 Players)
Hero was dealt
7
7
UTG folds, HJ raises to $2, Hero calls $2, BN folds, SB raises to $8, BB folds, HJ folds, Hero raises to $143.47, and is all in
UTG folds, HJ raises to $2, Hero calls $2, BN folds, SB raises to $8, BB folds, HJ folds, Hero raises to $143.47, and is all in
I think SB recognizes that MP is opening quite wide and folding to 3-bets often. On top of his already wide range for squeezing here I think it's possible he widens his range further in this specific scenario.
Thus I go for a backraise jam with 77's here. Do you guys think this is +EV? This is probably the bottom of my backraising range fwiw and I will sometimes do this with JJ+ if I know the blinds are pro-short stackers and squeeze heavy.
Thus I go for a backraise jam with 77's here. Do you guys think this is +EV? This is probably the bottom of my backraising range fwiw and I will sometimes do this with JJ+ if I know the blinds are pro-short stackers and squeeze heavy.
Loading 1 Comments...
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.
This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.