NL10 zoom have been losing money with overpairs, any argument for folding here?
Posted by r1xTer
Posted by
r1xTer
posted in
Low Stakes
NL10 zoom have been losing money with overpairs, any argument for folding here?
Blinds: $0.05/$0.10 (6 Players)
BN: $11.00
SB: $12.52
BB: $11.69
UTG: $11.82 (Hero)
MP: $17.20
CO: $9.45
SB: $12.52
BB: $11.69
UTG: $11.82 (Hero)
MP: $17.20
CO: $9.45
Preflop
($0.15)
Hero is UTG with
A
A
, , ,
Flop
($0.60)
7
6
J
, ,
Turn
($1.60)
7
6
J
9
, , , ,
River
($23.74)
7
6
J
9
4
Final Pot
SB
wins and shows three of a kind, Sixes.
UTG lost and shows a pair of Aces.
SB wins $22.67
Rake is $1.07
UTG lost and shows a pair of Aces.
SB wins $22.67
Rake is $1.07
Loading 9 Comments...
There are a couple of questions you can ask yourself here on the turn:
A few arguments:
* People tend to bluff too little.
* He has all 66-77-99 and sometimes JJ in his range. A lot of players tend to call 55-JJ, AQ,AK, some suited broadway from SB. Soooo he has a lot os sets in his range that goes to turn. And some AJ, KJ, QJ that gonna just call.
B/f turn.
Yep, continuing vs villain's raise is. Really,r eally expensive mistake
Thanks guys, some good food for thought. Yes he has all the sets in his range but also two overpairs KK, QQ and AJ, which is unlikely holding two blockers, KJ, QJ plus straight und flush draws and maybe AK, AQ that people are willing to stack off with. With the information that these games are on the nittier site I like the b/f turn. Maybe I need to have him on a tighter range here.
+1 to bet/folding turn. Classic balugatheorem spot. If you have one pair and someone raises your turnbet you should fold readless.
You block his FDs. You give him odds to only call with his value range, which means call>shove and folding is most likely best.
He has over pairs, but is he raising with them? Probably not..
not to mention your isolating yourself with the top of villains range.....
Be the first to add a comment