NL10: Rush AA on paired board vs Recreational Player
Posted by Zoty79
Posted by
Zoty79
posted in
Low Stakes
NL10: Rush AA on paired board vs Recreational Player
HJ: $8.72
CO: $30.41
BN: $7.40
SB: $4.12
BB: $14.04 (Hero)
UTG: $4
CO: $30.41
BN: $7.40
SB: $4.12
BB: $14.04 (Hero)
UTG: $4
Villain: 43/34/ 47 Hands
Preflop
($0.15)
(6 Players)
Hero was dealt
A
A
UTG folds, HJ raises to $0.30, CO folds, BN folds, SB folds, Hero raises to $1.10, HJ calls $0.80
UTG folds, HJ raises to $0.30, CO folds, BN folds, SB folds, Hero raises to $1.10, HJ calls $0.80
Flop
($2.35)
T
T
2
(2 Players)
Hero checks,
HJ bets $1.12,
Hero calls $1.12
Turn
($4.59)
T
T
2
5
(2 Players)
Hero checks,
HJ bets $2.24,
Hero calls $2.24
River
($9.07)
T
T
2
5
7
(2 Players)
Hero checks,
HJ checks
Final Pot
How do you play the Hand? Do you bet fold, or bet ship it, or is c/c good here?
Loading 4 Comments...
against a recreational player i'd play: bet bet shove
he is calling with a lot of worst pocket pairs and flushdraws, obvs he calls all of his Tx as well but since we block AT and the board blocks 50% of hands like JTs, T9s, QTs,... there are a lot more combos of worst pocketpairs and flushdraws then Tx combos.
Hi. I'd probably bet it myself. Sure, he probably bets most of his calling range anyway and we block so many hands that are likely to xback here, but I'd want to avoid a situation where he xbacks his pairs at some point, from which we're likely to extract value on each street.
And we don't need to pick a huge sizing vs a weaker player that will scare him off.
/fake e:
As for your questions - I'd probably bet/call it. I'm not too sure that he raise/calls a hand like 99 here, but he certainly might raise it 'for protection'. Also, I'd want him to improve to a pair w/ a random BRDW that he decided to get fancy with. :p And there aren't that many scare cards for us, so it's not much of a concern that we give him a free card, sort of.
Against fish in general I think you are much better off just betting this kind of hand yourself. You can lose value against fish a few different ways like- them having generally tiny betsizings or checking back turn once you have given up the initiative and check call and probably other ways too. Obviously if the fish is a maniac who will just blast off big bets for 3 streets with 100% of his range then your line will be better but I don't think it's best if you don't have that read.
As a side note, when I do try this k/cl line with something like AA here I think it's best to have AcAx so that when the river run out above happens he doesn't automatically get out of jail free with his 0% equity bluffs.
I like the line. The problem is that even a rec's calling range by the turn usually is going to be (Trips,flushes), but 60%+ of his hand range on this board is nothing that he could turn into a bluff. Even relatively tight players can overbluff this board, (this is even better since he is a 43/34).
Be the first to add a comment