Without knowing what type of player that was I would think he will only have 87s, then there's 32s which I don't think he will have multiway in the SB very often. There is also QQ which I think he will squeeze most of the time unless he is super passive. He also has 55,44 and some two pair combos all of which you beat. Long story short - I think you can call here. He only needs very few spazzes for this to be hugely +EV.

Vs {(44,55, 5x4x, 8x7x)@100, Qx6x@50, 3x2x@50, QQ@50} (where @50 means 50% of combos included) you have 59.8% equity OTT and your call assuming he does this with the above hands has an

EV=0.598x116.5BB-0.402x92.1BB=+32.6BB,

that's pretty good. Now think about how much your equity and therefore your EV goes up when he has a few spazzes here.

Random people show up with Q8o sorts of stuff here a whole lot.

Just snapcall. You're not in the worst shape ever against the rare straight, and you destroy hands like TP, 2PR and you're doing well againsts FDs.

I don't love it but I think you have to call this. You beat 2pair & lower sets and you're not in terrible shape against a straight.

Yeah he showed up with the 87 of spade, which is obviously the top of his range. Just quite unsure what the bottom of his range in this spot would be. As it's incredibly weird line for a flopped set to take, who flats the flop then OOP ships on a weird turn.

Weird 2 pairs makes sense I guess, and thats probably all I need to put into his range to make it an easiar call with A7 of spades

Agree with all the comment. Im not that happy about it, but I'd call. QQ is unlikely and he can do it with weird 2pairs or pairs + draw or something like that. If the guy is bad anough to donk shove like that OTT, he is bad enough to have some weird stuff in his range.

At first look I would fold this (thinking FML).

With absolutely no info on villain... this over 90% of time is 87s. I know it sucks, but from my experience every time I called an odd overbet shove (especially large overbets) was nothing else but the absolute NUTS. Every time, with no exception... no matter how unlikely (I snap called overbet shove vs fish with Ahigh flush just to see a straight flush :) ).

When you have some info on villain, see how he plays... shows that he can be looser and a bit crazier with large bets and raises than this becomes a snap-call but vs unknown this is a fold for me.

Simply because I think I just called these off too many times, and instead of getting frustrated afterwards (telling my self - comeon man, youve seen this shit before, why call?) I better just let it go and agree without calling that he does have the nuts.

Hope this helps. Cheers!

Snap call for me. I'd be pretty happy about it too.