Nasty hand #0 'His range is weak'
Posted by LuckyMer
Posted by
LuckyMer
posted in
Low Stakes
Nasty hand #0 'His range is weak'
Blinds: $0.10/$0.20 (4 Players)
BB: rose7758: $20.31
CO: jiesen123: $1.69
BN: catty111: $20.00 (Hero)
SB: Ibettergo: $46.43
CO: jiesen123: $1.69
BN: catty111: $20.00 (Hero)
SB: Ibettergo: $46.43
Preflop
($0.30)
catty111 is BN with
3
3
, , , ,
Flop
($4.20)
T
6
J
, ,
Turn
($8.40)
T
6
J
4
, ,
River
($16.80)
T
6
J
4
7
,
Villain is a reg.
For me his range looks very much like AK or AQ with one spade. And even if he has KJ, it will still be a tough call OTR I think.
Though if I start bluffing every 22-55 OTF, thats gonna be unbalanced :) At least I am not blocking AK AQ, but I guess I'd rather bluff off T9s here or T8s which are both in my range. Yeah, 97s too.
What you think?
Loading 9 Comments...
edit nvm missread whole hand lol.
Setmining hardly works 100bb deep. Flop call is too loose, turn and river play is somewhat ok as villain capped his range OTT, but we have to consider any move in the hand. And calling small pps vs 3bets 100bb deep is too loose.
I have not called OTF.. I bet 3 barrels. What moves shall I consider?
Sorry, yeah it makes some sense then.
You're essentially bluffing with no equity/no blockers, which I don't like.
Just because he checks, it doesn't mean that he's gonna XF a ton, which is why I would just XB and try to get to SD / maybe stab T/R sometimes.
All in all, I don't think it's gonna be a winning play + I wouldn't be surprised if he decided to play AKss/AQss like this or w/e.
Cool, nice thoughts on playing AKss this way.
I think better to ch on the flop, and try to get to sd.
U have better bluffs with more eq, and potential. Your sizes also a bit strange, be careful to what's Your range, and what U want to represent.
Sizing is actually standart, I'd play my whole range w 1/2-1/2-Jam here.
wb @ ipoker spewy kity!
u beat it, so y u no xb?
Be the first to add a comment