Hey guys,

I would be glad to hear your oppionions about naming crEV files to extract most value by reusing those again and again and at the same time simplifying their fanding. Here is my idea. Feel free to share comments, ideas and your methods.

I am posting to this forum, because I see that it has highest post ammount, but if it is wrong- feel free to move it to correct one.

I guess that system or cataloging system should divide files by actions that drastically changes ranges in crEV file.that means that there is no reason to store position ther, for example BvB or UTGvs BTN, because only ranges will be different (starting ranges, what is defined as thin and what is defined as good value betting hand, bluffcatcher and ETC).

Another factor that would be modyfing ranges- effective stack size. So maybe something like that that could work out:(stack size pre S- mid/(N or even without prefix)-normal/D-deep)(pre and postflop actions) (A aggressors perspective - C- callers perspective)and if needed then we can add additional information, like positions, squeezed, multiway etc:

so that could lool like this: S2b-b-b-b - A

that file would cover all RFI pots where shortie 3barreled and it doesnt matter if he faces raise or doesnt face on the river.Very similar example would be S2b-b-b-b-C, where you was caller in single raised pot and now you are facing 3barrelAnother example could be 3b-b/c-x-x-Athat would be that you 3bet somebody at 100bb effective and your cbet got raised and you called that raise. On the turn it was check, fallowed by river jam, that you called (there is no need to define last action as x/c, because in theory you should analyze all those scenarios in the file).

All additional details, like board texture, flush came and similar stuff could be added after Aggression (A/C) tag.

WHile aggression Tag defines just preflop aggressor and it would be logical to write it in PF section, I think that it could cause messy file sorting in explorer.