Microstakes rake structure on different sites
Posted by fefe.p
Posted by
fefe.p
posted in
Low Stakes
Microstakes rake structure on different sites
hey everyone, these days you hear a lot of people talk about how bad pokerstars rake/rake back system are specially for low stakes, but I was curious about what are the best sites to play other than pokerstars for 5-50NL, considering rake structure and playerpool, and what are the main differences between them. I would really apreciate if some of you could share your experience playing across different network, specially Party Poker, which seems to be getting a lot of attention and positive feedback lately.
Loading 2 Comments...
Party Poker rakeback is indeed very good. You can get up to 40% of cashback but the minimum they offer on the start is 20%. Also you have missions to complete which give additional $ and they propably reset after some time so you can do them again (i'm not sure about this).
Fastforward (zoom) games are reg infested but on the regular tables you can find a some amount of recreationals. I have the general impression that some decent Stars regs moved to PartyPoker just for the rakeback. Generally up to NL10 fastforward games are pretty tight and passive, the level increases dramatically at NL25 imo. (written from perspective of a player beating NL10 but struggling to win NL25).
Microgaming has the best rake for micro stakes in the industry. They cap rake at 3bb no matter the level up to 3$. So 20nl has a rake cap of 0.60$
Then you get some rakeback on top of that.
Just look at all the major networks and sites, look up their rake structure and compare. They are not all the same. Most cap at 3 - 4$ regardless of limit which is brutal.
Be the first to add a comment