Out Now
×

MDF vs pf 3b

Posted by

Posted by posted in Low Stakes

MDF vs pf 3b

Personally, I'm using the TGM's recommended MDF of ~45%, wc means I'm folding ~55% (villain's actual RFE for his 3b is ~68%, but author reduces it to ~55% for the fact that villain has postflop equity). Obv, my MDF consists of flatting, 4b value, and 4b bluffs.

What portion (% wise) of your overall opening range do you defend vs 3b or you think is an optimal% defend?

Another concern of mine is when we get 3b by a known fish or tight players w/ non-optimal 3b freq (on a nitty 3b freq side) but using a standard 3b sizing (so their RFE is equal to decent players). Bc if we exploit them by overfolding, aren't they also automatically exploiting us? How should I think about this spot?

Thanks ; )

3 Comments

Loading 3 Comments...

Jeff_ 6 years, 2 months ago

What stakes you play?
Rule of thumb to fold around 50%, vs some strategies we can fold less-> because ev of our lowest calls will improve. vs some more -> bigger sizing and tight 3betting range definitely folding more.
I wouldn't worry much how much I'm folding(if it is reasonable number 50-65) below nl500,nl600,nl1000.

Giozinhzo123 6 years, 2 months ago

I would never use mdf if i knew villains frequencies were way off. He doesnt exploit you,since your open raises show so.much profit already,when he is defending so tight.
Cheers

Be the first to add a comment

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy