NL16 Line Check: River Call
Posted by farside
Posted by
farside
posted in
Low Stakes
NL16 Line Check: River Call
Blinds: $0.08/$0.16 (6 Players)
BN: $40.82 (Hero)
SB: $16.45
BB: $10.80
UTG: $54.85
MP: $16.52
CO: $16.16
SB: $16.45
BB: $10.80
UTG: $54.85
MP: $16.52
CO: $16.16
Preflop
($0.24)
Hero is BN with
Q
9
, , , ,
Flop
($4.12)
2
J
9
,
Turn
($7.00)
2
J
9
5
,
River
($14.34)
2
J
9
5
8
,
Final Pot
BN
wins and shows a pair of Nines.
SB lost and shows a pair of Sevens.
BN wins $31.65
Rake is $1.49
SB lost and shows a pair of Sevens.
BN wins $31.65
Rake is $1.49
Hey guys!
Im new to 6max games and i feel quite uncertain in many spots.
I dont have any reads on opp. I guess my pre call is standard, right? What do you think of my river call here?
I block QT, fd missed but villains value range of Jx, overs, 99 is strong too.
One more Question: Whats the thinnest profitable vbet here in villains shoes? My guess would be QJ...
Thx for your help :)
Loading 5 Comments...
Many draws bricked so it should be okish calldown. Thinnest hand to valuebet in villain shoes? Probably KJ - QJ cant triple as you can have a lot of AJ/KJ, even offsuit ones.
BTW. I would mark this guy as maniac fish. Barelling off 7s there is huge blunder.
NL16 regs are pretty nitty, they tend to pot control/blufcatch hands like AJ. with no reads your MDF is 57%. You block QQ, and 99 for villian value hand. And you dont block Flush draws. I think is a good call. Just be careful, some regs from stars NL16/25/50 never river bluff shove.
Hide results, showing them will naturally cause biased responses.
Preflop-Not a fan of calling vs this size but it is not a disaster. History? Call will be better with some data. Unknown? Seems like very easy fold vs 4x+ 3 bet sizing.
Flop-Fine, this is the combo we want to be calling with here. Our 2pr outs are fairly clean as are our trips outs. We do, however, need to recognize both the fish and the reg have at least 25+ value bets here than crush us and we are getting to turns fairly weakly vs solid betting range and basically breakeven if he is betting quite wide.
Turn-Sounds nitty, but feels like a slightly losing call when looking at direct odds vs majority of pool. Obviously would continue on the 5d (get to river with 14 some odd good cards vs getting river drawing to a Q or 9 on the non diamond 5's).
River-If we get here you can fold vs majority of population. Their QT bluffs just got there, he still has a boatload of value, etc.
Again, we know this guy is volatile and we have a pretty easy call vs a guy that approaches postflop in this manner. Vs. overall pool or someone we have some good reads on, this can be perfectly fine.
Take note and adjust accordingly, be careful though he can adjust too.
Thank you! I appreciate your feedback. It seems there isnt a clear answer and with out reads and based on playerpool tendencies we might even find a fold (even on turn, which sounds a bit sick to me (because of our blockers).
Even when i cant fold on turn here most of the time, in game thinking of folding turn didnt even crossed my mind tbh :)
Be the first to add a comment