KQ vs aggro postflop
Posted by chessFan
Posted by
chessFan
posted in
Low Stakes
KQ vs aggro postflop
Hi!
In this hand, Im playing a guy who likes to raise a lot vs aggresor. His raise to cbet% is 63% and fold to cbet just 38%.
I didnt give too much credit to him when he raised the flop, because of the stats above. I decided to call. Even tough, he can have some flush draws or maybe QT combo for a OESD. I have KQ so i have blockers to that combo.
OTT both of us checked to the ace. I really dont think he has Ax after this, and i always discount QT because he should always bet there with his str8.
On the river i hit the queen and get two pair. At this point Im pretty sure i have the best hand, what would you consider to be the best line here? bet the river? induce a bluff from him, playing check/call? What do you think of the hand in general?
Loading 5 Comments...
Def checking as betting def doesnt accomplish anything. I would c/f as a default just because its actually kind of tough for us not to have at least this strong of a hand making it kind of a bad spot to bluff. If I felt a need to protect this part of my range against players I would check Tx hands as well.
Definitely start by checking, this hand makes no sense to have in our betting range. If he bets I'd probably fold most of the time because it's tough to think of hands that he can bluffraise the flop with that haven't either got us beat or enough showdown value to not need to bluff. As WM2k pointed out, it's also difficult for us to not have something pretty decent here so he shouldn't expect a ton of folds.
let me see if I understand what you guys are saying: you say it s a bad spot for him bluffing, so i cant expect him bluffing here too much, ok. But dont i have enough showdown value to call a bet from him as the hand was played?
Agree with the above, except that I'm probably not folding in this spot if he bets.
Be the first to add a comment