You can create an alias of population.Then select that alias and you can see the stats and filter for pre flop all ins etc

Question might be more fitting for the HM product forums. I know the method zinom1 recommends is real but I was never able to do it on HM2.

I'm not sure how to answer your actual question. Sorry!

two things popped into mind that might help though:
1) Maybe try instead to create archetypes of certain player types instead of a general pool. I say that as you've previously mentioned many of your opponents are in the 40/1 type range. So given that their 3bets are so tight, I'd expect that their FT3b and FT4b ranges are super low and 4b/5b are really tight. Maybe an alternate way to look at this is to compare specific strategies stemming from tight 3b ranges. (For example, even if 3b = 5%, a balanced strategy is tough to create but would likely be very top heavy on the 5b shoves, and maybe AK as bluffs). In general, I'd probably want to play very cautiously (aiming to flop monsters in position and fold more hands oop) vs. these 3bets until they start adjusting.

2) I saw something that Doug Polk said about his play before he got good. He pointed out that he was only ever getting in bad, even with KK. He said this is because he played such a tight 3b/4b range that nobody was playing back unless they beat it. Now that's extreme, but maybe your range is similarly tight which suggests the good players in your pool are properly adjusting?

Which version of hem are you using? Its quite simple to explain for HEM3

CrappyTimeSlot Hope this helps. This is over 1.6 million hands 5NL to 50NL. Green is the aggregate 4b range (not position specific) and the blue section is the call 3b section. As you can see, they 4b the top 12% of their range and defend 57% by calling. So, overall, they fold to 3b @ 31% of the time. Obviously this is higher in BTN vs SB 3b and BTN vs BB 3b spots where they fold substantially higher.

If you look to the far right, the overall 4b range in aggregate is 2.8%. If we look at it from a "linear" lens, that's like QQ+, AKs, AKo and a AQs. Obviously, things are not quite this easy. They are going to trap AA by calling the 3b and there is going to be some JJ in there and maybe a few bluffs.

This should help save you a bunch of time and effort in HM3 or PT4.

Below is the Gyazo link if the above Jpeg doesn't work

https://gyazo.com/d5dcd90c5fbce2ad5ac359ea57a0ffa8

I went through my faced a 4b hands at 25nl Bovada zone recently and it really is that tight.

In something like 129 hands there were less than 10 where a full stacked player 4b with something worse than AK. And of those several were AQ or JJ type stuff where it may not have been a bluff where there would have folded to a shove.

Non full stacked players 4b pretty tight but there were definitely closer to 50% bluff/spew vs top tier stuff.

HaAbDe As for you first paragraph, I agree with your analysis of those stats. I expect Bovada/Ignition to have some "strange" stats vs some of the other more reg infested sites.

As for the hand history purchases, I am not familiar with them or those sites. I remember back in the day I bought a couple million Pokerstars hands (when USA could play there) but I am not sure I utilized them much (we basically used VPIP, PRF, 3b and cbet stats and not much more back then). As for my 5 to 50NL hands, I did not make a purchase. I don't want to give much advice on purchasing since I don't have much experience. How much are they asking for hand histories nowadays?

Hand2Note is great for doing population analysis. Its iffy and hard to do in PT4 or HM3 as effectively. Since Ignition/Bovada is anonymous, players who use that site need to have pool benchmarks and work from there.