Hi so todays a little bit of a more advanced question so hoping that a pro could maybe shine some light. Range betting is offered as a good simplification by most coaches on the site but I was thinking about and was wondering if it's actually a lot worse than the videos suggest. So when we try to find out if range-betting is a good strategy we compare the EV of range-betting vs the GTO strategy and if the %pot lost is below a certain thresh-hold we consider it to be a reasonable simplification. But as I thought about it, I realised that the presented EV will of course come from the solver playing a minimally exploitable strategy against the range-betting strategy. However is they're a maximally exploitative strategy which actually causes a far greater EV difference? I feel as this could change strategies quite heavily from both perspectives.