Out Now
×

Hard Spot (Squeeze pot)

Posted by

Posted by posted in Low Stakes

Hard Spot (Squeeze pot)

Blinds: $0.08/$0.16 (6 Players) BN: $25.32
SB: $17.60
BB: $28.49
UTG: $13.75
MP: $16.41 (Hero)
CO: $26.95
Preflop ($0.24) Hero is MP with Q Q
UTG raises to $0.48, Hero calls $0.48, CO raises to $1.92, 3 folds, UTG folds, Hero calls $1.44
Flop ($4.56) 8 7 J
Hero checks, CO bets $1.91, Hero calls $1.91
Turn ($8.38) 8 7 J 2
Hero checks, CO bets $3.52, Hero calls $3.52
River ($15.42) 8 7 J 2 T
Hero checks, CO bets $19.60 and is all in

Squeezer stats: 32/24 968 hands. 3bet: 9.9 WTSD 33 W$SD: 39 WWSF: 44

What do you think of this hand? his sizings are weird and i really dont see a shove OTR with AA or KK prob AKcc dont know, JJ doesnt squeeze IMO ... really confused, please help.

15 Comments

Loading 15 Comments...

Kalupso 9 years ago

He can bluff AK and not much else. Folding is fine and the safe play here, but I could make a case for calling if the opponent is non-thinking/spewy and would bet some pairs, sets, etc at a small frequency. There are only a few strategies this is winning a little against and many strategies it is loosing a lot against.

QQ with a club is much closer.

klamsauce 9 years ago

I'm not advocating this play, but I'm just wondering what you guys think about c/shoving the turn here. Not blocking his fds might make this an option?

David Jimenez 9 years ago

I was thinking this too at first but his range is too strong and we would be likely isolating our self. Has to be -EV play

Kalupso 9 years ago

It is very easy to simulate situations that go All-inn on earlier streets, but the difficulty part is comparing it to the EV of calling.

aamadeo 9 years ago
  • I wouldn't discard JJ so easily, maybe with a low freq, but not 0 freq.

Let's say he sqzes with this range with probably some freq :
TT+, AQ+, AXs, 65s-T9s.

Let's say he CBets FDs and OESDs as a bluff on the flop and turn, and for value JJ+, 87s(Doubles), T9s(straight), AJs (3c)

OTR you're so dead because many of his bluffs connected the river, FD and some 98s, A9s.

Besides that you should consider make an exploitive fold if you think he doesn't barrel enough OTR, other wise I'd rather defend Jx and 9x, because I think you would get there with some FD as well.

Scrubx 9 years ago

Meh sad folding the river, but I would 3bet pre at a 100% frequency most likely. I would even consider 4-betting over the squeez, he seems to be quite active pre and he won't give you much credit for having a hand after just calling the utg open pre.

aamadeo 9 years ago

+1 pre flop comment. But I wouldn't 3bet 100%, but definitely a high freq. I'm saying this because there's a lot of nitty preflop guys on the field.

Scrubx 9 years ago

my experience at 16NL specifically is, that people are quite crazy pre - but my sample on that stake isent too big (like 10-20k hands) - but yes I agree you dont have to 3bet at a 100% freq

kafrinius 9 years ago

well played until river..club draws like QKcc,JQcc,AKcc,AQcc,AJcc get there + u are not holding Qc at all...

In general i have two plans with an aggro sqzer..

1) 4bet on his sqz ( history should play a role here ) but it's an obvious move and u reveal ur range cheaply
2) call pre and x/calldown safe runouts ( Non Axx, Kxx etc ) [preferable]

Be the first to add a comment

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy