its very easy once you check since most people will be bigger than optimal on these boards with too much value thin value, so easy fold vs anything bigger than a 1/4 pot size bet

vs a 1/4 pot size bet or smaller you have direct odds to hit one of your overcards so pure call vs that sizing

if you still feel compelled to call vs bigger bet sizes with AK here then it means your not checking back enough strong hands which is a symptom of your auto cbetting from the meta 10 years ago

hands like T9 J9 98 87 are being pure checked according to Snowie, so if you are auto cbetting any pair any draw any combo pair draws along with your overcards, backdoor equity bluffs and pure bluffs then your cbetting way too much and will find it hard to fold AK here

once you balance your range youll have better understanding of these spots, start by pulling the weakest cbets you would auto bet from 10 years ago and check calling them instead such as weak top pairs, second pairs, weak draws

you dont have to play pure optimal like a solver (snowie thinks AA is a mostly a check here but at 10nl its certainty better to bet), but you have to redistribute your range from what you were use to 10 years ago to meet gto halfway so that your still playing an exploitatively game but a bit more balanced than the meta you were accustomed to

yea it was really fun and easy to cbet 2/3-3/4 of pot on every board at a super high frequency on full tilt and show instant profit, but after solvers we can now learn how to bet at a lower frequency to balance checks, and using smaller bet sizes as the aspects that differ the most from modern games compared to 10 years ago