Flat vs squeeeze Range?/ Man in the middle...
Posted by kiDcAnUck
Posted by
kiDcAnUck
posted in
Mid Stakes
Flat vs squeeeze Range?/ Man in the middle...
Hi, as an example lets say u rfi mp, bu calls, sb sqeeezes.
Lets just say I usually defend this range,
KK-55,AKo,AQs-ATs,A5s-A4s,KQs-KJs,QJs,JTs,T9s,98s,87s,76s,[100]AA,AKs[/100],[0]A9s-A6s,A3s-A2s[/0]
100=4b, 0= bluff candidates
might 4b wider for Val, 4b KK like 90%, flat AA somtimes, some tweaks here and there, etc.
We can defend tighter because bu is helping us defend, but curious as to what hands you guys might be flatting here?
What about, my personal faves, the SC's?
How would your strategy change if you had absolute position?
TY
Loading 3 Comments...
by absolute position i mean something like eg, bu- sb cc- bb 3b
up
I like your defending range even though it should be wider or tighter depending on stack deepness,size of squeeze, oppo inclinations. with absolute position I'd widen some gappers suited like QTs J9s T8s, especially if sb/cc is a recreational player playing >150x
Be the first to add a comment