Out Now
×

Facing a strange raise with an old TP OTR. 100nl

Posted by

Posted by posted in Low Stakes

Facing a strange raise with an old TP OTR. 100nl

.wt_rel td {font-weight: bold;}.hheader { font-weight: bold; font-variant: small-caps; font-size : 13px; color: black;}.wt_hh1{ font-weight: bold; font-variant: small-caps; font-size : 12px; color: black; }.wt_h2{ font-variant: small-caps; font-size : 11px; color: black; }.wt_t1{ font-size : 11px; color: black; background-color: #eeeeee; border-collapse: separate; border-spacing: 4px; border:1px solid #DDDDFF;}.wt_blue {color:blue}.weaktight_hand {font-size: 11px;}.wt_ul {list-style:none;}$0.50/$1 No Limit Holdem • 4 PlayersGenerated by weaktight.com.CO$100BTN$127.58SB$90.90WM2K (BB)$111.69 Pre-Flop ($1.50, 4 players)Hero is BB 1 fold, BTN raises to $2, 1 fold, WM2K calls $1 Flop ($4.50, 2 players) WM2K checks, BTN bets $3.50, WM2K calls $3.50 Turn ($11.50, 2 players)WM2K checks, BTN checks River ($11.50, 2 players)WM2K bets $8.50, BTN raises to $25, $16.5 to WM2K ($97.69)?

Villains a decent reg stealing about 55% OTB. OTR I figure I should be value betting as I beat Tx hands that checked it back and I can represent a fair amount of bluffs with the busted FD. Checking to call with this hand is also reasonable though seeing as the value is likely pretty thin and I probably have a enough value bets with KT and better. I havent counted it all out though so idk for sure. Anyways I do chose to bet this time and dude raises. WTF? I mean this guy isnt retarded. He likely knows that he reps nothing. So is this some goofy played JJ? 6x that decided to check for who knows what reason? JT? Maybe he s turning a bad T into a bluff? Idk such a bizarre raise I m really not sure.

8 Comments

Loading 8 Comments...

WM2K 12 years, 1 month ago
Idk could be reasonable. Tbh at the time I was really tempted to go all in as I have a blocker to a slowplayed TT and he s somewhat capped his range by not betting the turn. Also I felt that it was more likely he was going for a value raise then a bluff as the line is such bs that I could be calling him lite.
cold7betfold 12 years, 1 month ago
His range on checking behind on the turn I think is 44-JJ, AJ+, KJ+, JT, T9, T8 ( if you stab alot on rivers but fold to lots of 2nd barrels he could also check : QQ+, 86, 76, 96s, 64s)
It would be interesting to know your stat for stabbing the river after it goes check check. (that would be real important to determine how loose he could be here or if he only raises for value and what hands he could check back the turn with)
His river valueraising range is hard to determine but I give it a shot: 44, 66, TT, JJ(+), AJ, KJ, JT, (78, 86, 96s, 64s).
We lose againt every hand in that range obviously.
Now we have to think about how many hands he will turn into a bluff that he didn't want to bet on the turn.
I don't think he will check flush draws or gutshots on the turn behind so if we put AQ, AK(without AcKc) into his riverraisingrange we would have 27,55% equity and we need ~27% to break even.

http://www.fpppro.com/fold-equity-calculator.php
Input: $97,69/0%/$11,5/$25
--> Villain must fold at least 90% of the time.

So a shove would be pretty breakeven if he would only call with: 44, 66, TT, JJ, 64s. (only if AQ+ is in his river raising range, if it's not in then he would only have to call 66, TT, JJ, 64s to make it breakeven)
WM2K 12 years, 1 month ago
Hey thanks for the post. Idk what numbers your put into the calculator but theres not way the bluff has to work 90% of the time. That d be only true for a pretty enormous overbet. $97.5/0%/$45/$16.5 With these numbers it needs to work 68%. Quite a bit and this is prolly why I didnt pull the trigger.

I m not sure exactly what my river stabbing frequency is it s reasonably high I m sure. I prolly defend a good idk 55-60% hands from the bb vs a button this loose. However I do c/f the flop a ton. I probably should be calling with this hand given how many gutters and fds I d be taking a shot with on the river. Idk this spot is so weird and I m really unsure what to do.
3Kids 12 years, 1 month ago
I think many many value hands will bet the turn since the board is drawy. I can see some players checking behind with full houses but I think it's fps.

What level does this player think on? Have you seen him bluff raise a river before? If not I think you should fold. He has to bluff raise mroe than 36% of the time for a call to break even. Without knowing that he is playing a balanced game against you, I assume his frequencies are skewed one way or another. Either he is bluff raising 50%+, or 5%.
wuwei 12 years, 1 month ago
To me villains range OTR is weighted towards thin value with AJ/TJ type hands. I think villain is unlikely to check 6x, strong Tx and overpairs because of the two flush draws. He should also bet his boats and quads OTR in order to get money in and because we are likely to call again on this turn (he also might want to barrel some semibluffs so checking his monsters would be bad). As you said he is repping narrow which, I agree, makes bluffs somewhat less likely as he should know this. I think KT is not a call (more like KJ/AJ or better). It could be a decent hand to jam with, however. Are there hands we want to jam for value here? What hands could villain be bluffing with (something like 78, A high or a weak Tx)?
wuwei 12 years, 1 month ago
The shove could be slightly profitable. I assumed villain is raising JJ (discounted to 1 combo), TT (discounted to 1), A6 (discounted to 4), JT (9 combos), AJ and KJ with some kind of FD (14 combos), QJ (8 combos), QT (2 combos), A high (5 combos), 78 (2). That is, 46 combos in total. Further I assumed that villain is only calling JT or better to a shove. In that case, we have 17% equity with a call and 68.5% fold equity when we shove. Just about what we need and there would be a decent number of better hands that fold.

Generally, villains range consists of nut hands (JJ,TT, 6x), thin value hands (JT,Jx), and bluffs. Depending on how large these portions are we have a more or less profitable shove. As described above, I think thin value hands are likely and nut hands unlikely. Therefore, a shove may be profitable (given he doesn't call light). Which hand to use and whether we should shove here at all is a different question. For a call to be profitable we would have to assume less thin value hands and more bluffs. I think this is very unlikely. So, we should not call.

Be the first to add a comment

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy