Effícient range vs range analysis

Posted by

Posted by posted in Mid Stakes

Effícient range vs range analysis

Hi

I've begun analyzing different boards with a friend. We start with late position ranges since they are the most common situations. What we currently are trying to answer is:

1, What hands must X defend to make PFR indifferent (or worse) with his bad bluffs?
2. What hands should PFR check to make FI indifferent (or worse) with his bad bluffs? (check/call as pfr)
3. Will we be able do defend enough on later streets with this range?
4. What turns and rivers are best for this range?
5. What turns and river are the worst for this range?
6. Do we have different bluffs in our range? Or, for example, when a flush card hit, will we have way to few bluffs?

Do you guys have something more you think we should take into consideration?

We have just started this project and this far we have used CREV and selected different boards, Then we set up betting ranges and checking range that defend the minimum defence freq according too 1-a% and look how these ranges will be able to play different turns by grouping similar turns together.

By the way, since we are trying to make FI indifferent from betting and checking his bluffs, and his bluffs have EQ on early streets, how should we calculate alpha? By making a decision tree where we check this hand, so we see our ev when checking?

What we are wondering are what method/programs we should use to be the most efficient? What method will save us the most time? What method will give us the best opportunity to carry over conclusions from one board type to another? (time saver).

Loading 5 Comments...

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy