A few hands before this I made a play in the BB where the BTN raises, Mr Kenwood called and I 3B to 46c holding Th 8c. The BTN folded but Kenwood called. From this I gathered his calling range is wide as any v.strong hand would surely have been 4b pf. He also check/folded to my C-bet of 70c on a K 9 4 r board. So my image of him is passive and a bit of calling station.

So the HJ (kenwood) limps which reaps of weakness, I am on the BTN and feel this is a good place to steal and decide to pop it upto 20c. The HJ calls. The fact that he just calls, i think removes hands like QQ+ or AK as at this level I feel anyone especially a limper is going to 4B those hands PF all day everday.

The flop is dream for me. I decide the best play here is to c-bet once he checks to represent me hitting the J. I understand as I am on the BTN my range is going to be wide but at the same time I am not going to be C-betting so much on this flop without hitting. I am not sure if Kenwood is thinking so deeply about my hand and has probably decided I am c-betting even if I miss the flop. He decides to call, which again means I can remove trips from his hand because of the flush draw and probably AJ and A6 as he would of either bet first or check/raised these. The only hands I feel I can put him on now is JK-J8, a weak flush draw (strong nut flush draws would surely raise?) and maybe a drawing hand like 57, 45, mid pairs and weak Aces that have hit, A6, A3.

The turn is the 4h completing the flush. The fact he checks this feels very weak to me. If he did have 57 he has obviously hit but he would only check that hand if it was off-suit and surely he would never be limping pre-flop in the HJ with 57off? I decide to bet again, firstly to protect my hand from another heart on the river, value and the intention to call if he min raises. He again calls which leads me to feel he is on a hand like J9-JK.