sb is a very good player and in this spot probably has a standard sb range which is pretty tight, co plays almost any two and in this case had T3s which is almost a flip against my hand

Do you mean T3 of spades? You aren't flipping: you have 60% equity against that hand. Anyway, you only need 33% or so, so it doesn't matter either way. If he showed up with T3s, he could have all sorts of junk in his range.

If SB is a good player, you should tend to just call because he'll play really well against a raise. But raising is ok. Your hand just so much equity that pretty much anything is fine. Raising made CO spazz and jam here, so it worked out well for you.

I've been thinking about the hand more and I think I'm unbalanced in my calling range and that I don't have any monsters. If I call here and the person behind me folds I fully expect an overbet on the turn from the sb. I don't think I can call a huge bet on the turn.

I raise all of my sets, straights, and two pairs so if I only call I don't have any of those hands. I'm thinking of bringing some monster hands into my calling range that have blockers to the flush draw but I don't know if I'm losing ev by doing this.

Calling monsters is not how we stop ourselves getting abused on the turn on a dynamic board, we do that by having sufficient board coverage that we improve to have new monsters on enough turn cards and when it bricks off really hard we're supposed to get shoved around a little bit but hands like this are the ones that we use as our slam dunk call downs to the river. I really don't think the message that you should take from this is slowplay more because that's really counter productive and loses us a lot of EV. You want to start calling your monsters to protect your range when SPR is really short and you're in position so the money is going in anyway. If you look at how pio plays at deep SPRs the number one priority tends to be getting money into the pot with your good hands and everything else including board coverage and range protection tends to take a back seat to that. Also having traps actually doesn't change much, until traps become something like 13% (if I remember correctly) of your calling range on the previous street villain is still supposed to keep bullying you with over bets and then when you stack them with a trap you were often going to stack off with them anyway.

If the board was much more static then we can protect our range a bit because we're not going to have many new monsters on the turn but I'm still not a fan of making this a big part of your game, I think it's much more beneficial particularly in the long run to get used to making the more marginal calldowns (even crying calls) with the right hands than it is to just sit there and fold them because "I'll have trapped sets here he can't exploit me" which is honestly just a lie to tell yourself when the betting gets scary.

And just in case you needed any more convincing when you call bets from a theory perspective you are supposed to condense your range (lose a lot of the worst hands and a few of the best) and as such will often have an equity advantage going into the turn which is enough to offset your nut disadvantage.

No worries, glad it was useful