Confusion re: Pot Odds vs Minimum Defense Freq
Posted by Yaphet-Kotto
Posted by Yaphet-Kotto posted in Low Stakes
Confusion re: Pot Odds vs Minimum Defense Freq
Say we're on the river facing a pot-sized bet.
According to pot odds, we're getting 2:1 and should call if we expect to win >33% against Villain's range.
Minimum Defense Freq (MDF) tells a different story. It says that since our opponent is risking 1pbs to win 1psb, we need to call 50% of the time or he's auto-profiting with his bluffs.
Confusing, right?
If we base our decision on pot-odds, we're only calling 33% -- not enough to keep villain indifferent to bluffing with ATC. If we use MDF instead, now we're calling 50% when (against a balanced range) we're only good 33%.
So my question is: are pot-odds and MDF supposed to be used in tandem? That is, if you think a villain is trying to exploit you with his bluffs, are you just supposed say "MDF it I call" 50% of the time, and do so with a range that wins >33% of the times you call?
Somebody please enlighten me.
Loading 1 Comments...
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.
This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.