Please, more stats (: This image tells only you are a big losing player, but not why. The mental game at poker is really tough indeed, and you should be putting some work on it instead of only studying the technical part. I recommend reading/listening to Jared's books (The Mental Game of Poker 1 & 2). I would also recommend to follow a rule of stopping after an "x" buy-ins loss, x being the amount of buy-ins you can lose until start tilting.

idk if these stats help with anything, but i included them. Also, did it help a lot after reading Jared's books?

Bad beats happen and will continue to happen so expect them. However, if it affects your game and you start playing your B-game and C-game, then you need a way to either not tilt or stop playing during the session or a longer time-frame.

For methods of dealing with tilt, see Jared's first book or his videos on Youtube. Write down the process and try it out.

Have you tried the 'LeakTracker' tab in PT? It's quite awesome to get an auto-generated analysis/diagnosis and advice (together with videos). You could do that in increments of 10,000 hands, but it's more accurate with more hands.

Ensure you tag your bad hands, review hands and best hands in PT4 while playing for easy review later.

Select one good book for the game you're playing and one good video series and then try to improve your game by studying both.

Good luck.

Yes, this is 6 max. So, do i shutdown once he calls my flop bet? or depends on board structure and villian? Also, do i con't w/ a marginal holding on the flop to prevent him from getting value w/ ATC?

you can xc some hands that cant get 3 streets. And xr some bluffs and strong hands and x/f give ups. You don't need to stop him betting any 2 cards b/c he has invested money calling your flop bet.
Even in 2015 i still find people are more value heavy ott so i prefer to slightly under bluff vs most of the population. they call TP/2nd pair and draws otf most of which doesn't fold turns.

troll somewhere else plz

I think anyone can learn by playing, the problem, probably, is how he is approaching the game. When someone shows up with a graph like this after 200k hands, it seems to me that his approach to the game is something like "I will do this with this hand on this board", it seems like a lot of autopiloting and a very static strategy in which there is not much thinking involved. Poker is about thinking about every single decision you make, and if you are doing that, the more hands you play, the better you get at figuring out what is the best decision, based on the previous decisions you made and their results.

aite thanks a ton bro!

or u can try flipping , dem burgers at mcdonald

alright thanks man!

np bro, anytime :D

I hope it will help:)

Please do: his posts help no one.

WTSD % is 28.80, W$SD is 53.18, and im not sure where to find River call Efficiency, but my River aggression factor is 2.45. What should i do to change all of this? Be more aggro when needed?

Being "more aggro" ist just way too broad. You have to take a closer look where exactly you lack aggression and show too much passivity.

Like your WTSD of 53.18% ... this means, that significantly more often than 50% you won when you saw the showdown. This sounds "nice", but actually it costs you money, because you don't valuebet thinly enough and likely not call often enough (hence the river call efficiency!).