Bluffspot multiway pot on river NL50
Posted by Nik0la
Posted by
Nik0la
posted in
Low Stakes
Bluffspot multiway pot on river NL50
CO is a decent reg on the nitty side. What do you think about the raise on the river? I'm thinking he bet/folds 3x and some flushes. I probably wouldn't check behind turn in a HU pot with FD but since we are multiway i'm going to play some NFD's this way.
SB: 99.25 BB (VPIP: 19.23, PFR: 12.82, 3Bet Preflop: 5.41, Hands: 399)
BB: 129.19 BB (VPIP: 24.27, PFR: 19.66, 3Bet Preflop: 9.18, Hands: 777)
UTG: 255.41 BB (VPIP: 29.85, PFR: 19.40, 3Bet Preflop: 14.71, Hands: 69)
CO: 321.52 BB (VPIP: 27.42, PFR: 20.99, 3Bet Preflop: 9.51, Hands: 1,873)
Hero (BTN): 222.12 BB
SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB
Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has Jh As
fold, CO raises to 2.88 BB, Hero calls 2.88 BB, SB calls 2.38 BB, fold
Flop : (9.63 BB, 3 players) 4s 2s Ac
SB checks, CO checks, Hero bets 7.22 BB, SB calls 7.22 BB, CO calls 7.22 BB
Turn : (31.28 BB, 3 players) Kc
SB checks, CO checks, Hero checks
River : (31.28 BB, 3 players) 5s
SB checks, CO bets 25 BB, Hero raises to 71.38 BB
Loading 5 Comments...
I don't like it. Also I don't know if your read that villain bet/folds 3x and some flushes is correct. Just keep it simple, bet turn and check behind most rivers, there is no need to get this fancy
The blocker is overrated here, imo as I doubt ppl bet folding even the lowest flushes ever. Also I think betting turn for value and protetcion, folding agaisnt a raise which is rarely to occur seems better.
Yeah when I think about it more it seems kinda bad. Though reg does have a fold button, wouldn't do this vs fish or loose reg.
wp imo if you have a clean image and lol @ calling here in villain's shoes with low flushes vs 90% of the regs at the limit
not sure how is 27/20 a reg on the nitty side though
Nitty might be the wrong word preflop but from my experience hes kinda straight forward post flop and dosen't fight for many pots.
Be the first to add a comment