bluffcatching range vs river overbet after PFA checked flop
Posted by ohgodwhy
Posted by
ohgodwhy
posted in
Low Stakes
bluffcatching range vs river overbet after PFA checked flop
Blinds: $0.25/$0.50 (6 Players)
BN: $263.81
SB: $55.43
BB: $50.00 (Hero)
UTG: $83.58
MP: $112.40
CO: $10.51
SB: $55.43
BB: $50.00 (Hero)
UTG: $83.58
MP: $112.40
CO: $10.51
villain 26/23 over 20 hands
Preflop
($0.75)
Hero is BB with
X
Y
, , ,
Flop
($2.75)
5
7
6
,
Turn
($2.75)
5
7
6
A
, ,
River
($6.25)
5
7
6
A
T
,
I even think the pot was smaller ingame (~$5.75) due to rake. What is your default calling range in that spot? To me it looks like he only reps Ax 2pairs and really not much else. I'm not even sure he'd to this with AK. Can't we just call with any (board) pair here?
Loading 3 Comments...
My favorite NLHE hand ;D
I think Ax will be a very marginal call here without any good blockers, and in most cases -ev
It looks like villain has atleast a an AK-Q type hand or two pair trying to get value. I don't really get the overbet because there isn't alot worse that can call. Villain probably only does this with twp pair or better. I'd try and see what he shows down in future to see if he bluffs like this though. I'd expect to see two pair AX alot here.
I'd be x/r turn and river with pretty high frequencies. I don't think villain is bluffing much, so I wouldn't want to hero call and anything like set + I'd be jamming. Maybe call some 2p stuff.
I think villain's overbet is really bad
Be the first to add a comment