Being herocalled, anything in betting to give a hint?
Posted by MegaGrinder
Posted by
MegaGrinder
posted in
Low Stakes
Being herocalled, anything in betting to give a hint?
Blinds: $0.50/$1.00 (6 Players)
SB: $100.00
BB: $84.61
UTG: $227.65
MP: $128.34
CO: $100.00
BN: $190.00 (Hero)
BB: $84.61
UTG: $227.65
MP: $128.34
CO: $100.00
BN: $190.00 (Hero)
I doubled against CO earlier with 3-betting QQ and he reraised AI with KTs, Then I did another 3-bet IP and checked behind and gave it up for aggression.
Villain seems to be solid from the stats. Sessions stats 23/18, with high 3-bet 18% but sample only 52 hands. After lookup he also seems to be 5-tabling so he also looks like a regular.
Villain seems to be solid from the stats. Sessions stats 23/18, with high 3-bet 18% but sample only 52 hands. After lookup he also seems to be 5-tabling so he also looks like a regular.
Preflop
($1.50)
Hero is BN with
J
A
, , , ,
I want to add a little bit pressure, thinking that I can either bluff or catch a hand.
Flop
($15.50)
6
6
2
, ,
Turn
($32.50)
6
6
2
4
, ,
Villain did show AcQc so here would have been a spot to CR? The fact that he didn't makes me wonder even more.
River
($74.50)
6
6
2
4
3
, ,
I was thinking that my line would have been very consistent for QQ/KK/AA. Even AK maybe for bluff, which would have beaten villains AQ at river.
I was thinking that I could get folds from 77-JJ. Didn't ecpect a call from AQ
The reason why I am posting this hand is that I have seen lately a lot of sick calls from villains especially in NL texas. Are there some tools like Notecaddy, that people can use to justify these?
When I see this kind of call against me from a winning player there are two options. Either he did an incredible bad call, or there was something he could justify the action and has therefore an awesome advantage over me.
If by some software assistance (or by my betting/timing tells) he was able to deduct that I have nothing often enough, this gets scary. Then I would definitely need to know how it was done to reverse exploit this and try to bet value so, that people would think that I am bluffing. But right now I am completely glueless how this call was done.
I was thinking that I could get folds from 77-JJ. Didn't ecpect a call from AQ
The reason why I am posting this hand is that I have seen lately a lot of sick calls from villains especially in NL texas. Are there some tools like Notecaddy, that people can use to justify these?
When I see this kind of call against me from a winning player there are two options. Either he did an incredible bad call, or there was something he could justify the action and has therefore an awesome advantage over me.
If by some software assistance (or by my betting/timing tells) he was able to deduct that I have nothing often enough, this gets scary. Then I would definitely need to know how it was done to reverse exploit this and try to bet value so, that people would think that I am bluffing. But right now I am completely glueless how this call was done.
Final Pot
CO
wins and shows a pair of Sixes.
BN lost and shows a pair of Sixes.
CO wins $199.00
Rake is $2.50
BN lost and shows a pair of Sixes.
CO wins $199.00
Rake is $2.50
Loading 4 Comments...
Wow interesting hand. It's not my stake so I really cannot gave you useful advice.
His call can't be so exploitative because you guys have little history (52 hands).
Maybe he could think that 77-TT would check behind river? Don't know.
Also your bet at the river is pretty large, so maybe he could think you got more bluffs in your range. Would people usually shove KK on the river with this kind of boards? It's a real question, I don't know how to play NL100.
Depends on where you play, notecaddy may or may not be allowed. Though unless he bought some HH, he shouldn't have a ton of info on you after only 52 hands.
I think his call is a bit spewy and likely slightly -EV. If he had AK (which he probably doesn't given preflop, then it'd be closer).
On the flop, is this your standard c-bet sizing? Seems too large to me unless you're playing a fish and sizing up for value for exploitative reasons.
I think his call is fine against someone who:
1) has a very high 3-bet %
2) has very high cbet F/T/R %
3) has very high WWSF
4) has very high 3-bet BTNvCO
Does this describe you? If so, he could of purchased some HH and be basing his call off HUD stats.
If not, he could just be going with an intuitive read that you're going to have a lot of AJ/KQ/Ax and only be doing this for value with QQ+ (and occasional A5s/K5s/65s/54s) and he's blocking QQ and AA. Problem is AK beats him and he's also blocking AJ/KQ/Ax from your bluffing range.
Interesting hand.
Thanks for the reply.
My 3-bet from this year in NL is 8,34% from button.
Continuation bets from flop, turn and river are:
Flop: 59,8 %
Turn: 54,2 %
River: 50,0 %
So if he has hand histories more, this is how these should look like.
According these if I understand correctly, the call should just not happen. I understand that turn is okay and at river AQ is close to the pocket pairs, but however.
I am not familiar with notecaddy though. I know it exist, but never learned to use it.
if you shoving river or betting turn with AK with high freq, you are so over bluffing this river. AJ I believe we can shove sometimes, but I will be looking my range very carefully. Have so many potential bluffs and little fold equity vs smart reg.
Be the first to add a comment