What I answer to you in here,

http://www.runitonce.com/nlhe/set-of-aces-in-3-way-pot-3-bet-pot/#/comment-161711

could probably help you out once again in this hand, as I don't like the bluff that much, if he has fold 100% to 3bet and he now calls, what do you want to bluff? He must have a hand, and plus you have value I just don't know what you are trying to accomplish, if you think the ace isn't good enough vs him, do you really think he's folding better than you here? I sure don't like the bet turn, the card isn't good for you most of the times and you barrel away once more, and than after 4th club comes you get shoved...

I dislike the 3bet also, if he's folding that much, our A7 will be good vs the hands he doesn't fold to 3bet, so we only isolating here vs a strong range of our opponent.

x/f since turn, that would be my line and I don't mind the cbet flop since we hit, but after him calling I'm just not putting more money in that pot, 2 spewy

I would check either flop or turn. Flop check is fine since we really can't get 3 streets of value anyway and it's nice to have some Ax-hands in our checkback range. Once we bet the flop, turn check is mandatory imo, simply because turn improves a lot of hands and we don't really have much value anymore.

A7s seems a bit too weak to be 3-betting for value and too good to change into a bluff. Flatting seems better.

Flop seems like a check behind, mostly for pot control against his range (often loaded with stronger Ax).
If you do decide to bet flop, then chek behind turn. The few hands we were ahead off on the flop now have us beat.

River has to be a fold.

Flatting seems much better than 3-betting here and as said above we don't want to be turning it into a bluff. I think checking the turn here is best then folding out the river to his jam. He's almost always got the club draw when he calls then turn and jams like that

for example, if i would have check the turn and a 4clubs come on river and he checks... do you bet for value or you go with you SD vavlue by checking

if villain would be like 19/17 for exemple 100% fold to 3 bet... would it be a good hand to 3 bet bluff? or i should still call

I don't feel we should be inventing with a hand that is such straight-forward. Please acknowledge what hand you are playing, in this case an Ace Suited Not that great kicker, I'm mostly happy to flat here because ace might be good, and I'm sure when flush draw comes we not folding unless villain smash us pot size bets.

As so, the hand is really good for us to go see a flop, instead what you did was 3bet since hes 3bet folding so much, but heres a thing, you can't go with the 100% 3bet fold, you have that stat like that because YOU DIDN'T HAVE ENOUGH HANDS with this villain.

I don't like the 3bet here since we can have value, why go bluff it? I don't like 3bet bluffing with such hands here, like I said when he folds, great, he folded a hand below yours, when he pays, you iso vs his strong range.

As if the 4 clubs come on river and he checks, I'm not EVER betting here for value, but might try make a bet for bluff to try fold him some hands which doesn't have a club and could be ahead of us. Be careful with call stations here, I wouldn't bluff that constantly but I think it's a good spot to bet if villain checks.