ATs CRed on flop 3 ways on button
Posted by unknown20
Posted by
unknown20
posted in
Low Stakes
ATs CRed on flop 3 ways on button
Blinds: $0.05/$0.10 (9 Players)
BN: $9.78 (Hero)
SB: $10.60
BB: $10.39
UTG: $10.41
UTG+1: $10.52
MP: $11.28
MP+1: $10.17
MP+2: $10.00
CO: $7.19
SB: $10.60
BB: $10.39
UTG: $10.41
UTG+1: $10.52
MP: $11.28
MP+1: $10.17
MP+2: $10.00
CO: $7.19
Preflop
($0.15)
Hero is BN with
A
T
, , , ,
Flop
($1.95)
2
J
Q
, , , , ,
Final Pot
BB wins $3.77
Rake is $0.18
Rake is $0.18
when I get CRed here villain must have AQ+ here and he seems to want me to call? I think villain has shown strength I'm not sure I can represent diamonds on the turn/river
Loading 14 Comments...
Its nobrainer fold vs. raise.
Im not sure but i dont like betting flop either, we got some good cards on turn but its bad flop for stealing pots in 3bet pots.
Well played and its fine to stab on this board, you dont really get x/r often here and you just have a gutter.
do you think that xb is an option with ATcc?
Villain has a 2.0 flop AF and high 75% WWSF. when the SB folds is his CR range wider here?
thanks very much!!!!!
wp imo
calling the xr, binking the gutter and slowrolling him is also an alternative. Do not attempt if your timebank is <60sec/your chat is banned though
std, wp
but I can look at his turn frequency and try to bluff him off the hand? or maybe 3 ways villain thinks he has to be narrow?
Seems fine as played. We have very little equity and we are more than likely defending too much to a cr if we add naked gutters.
I would XB flop more often than not, but betting could well be best from an exploitative stand point (populations tends to have weak checking ranges, XFing too much). Just keep in mind that if you're betting all your AT/KT K9s/T9s/98s, diamonds and some BD clubs then you're going to be stabbing at least 60 combos of bluffs. Now if your value-range is, say, KQ+ then you only have 30-something value combos which means you're massively over-bluffing flop. Again, this could be fine exploitatively speaking, but villain could then adjust by implementing a XR range which would be printing vs your strategy. AP, easy fold OTF (his range is very strong).
Do you allways think like this, like you must have atleast 50/50 value/bluffs to balance? :)
No, I don't strive to maintain such frequencies, besides, a 50/50 ratio isn't going to be correct given the price we lay him plus the fact that we capture some of the pot with our bluffs (our bluffs have equity). That said, knowing how wide my value-range is helps me keep my frequencies (somewhat) in check.
Don't forget, we're not conceding the pot by checking back here, we can still win the pot on later streets by improving or by stealing it OTT/OTR vs his check-down range.
Would you agree with the first response that its an easy fold to a raise? Even with the SB calling giving you just over 6-1 ?
Yes, I think so. We're only happy to continue on Kx turns and even then the Kd could be tainted. His range is simply too strong here.
Be the first to add a comment