PokerStars - $0.02 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4: http://www.pokertracker.com

BTN: 98.5 BB
SB: 598.5 BB
BB: 107 BB
UTG: 109 BB
MP: 110.5 BB
Hero (CO): 266 BB

SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has Th 9h
fold, fold, Hero raises to 3 BB, fold, SB raises to 9 BB, fold, Hero raises to 21 BB, fold

Hero wins 19 BB

I'm thinking that in nl2 people generally overfold to 4bets by a huge margin so we have to have a 4bet bluff range. We cant have hands like A8s in it because we will mostly be dominated. With these high(ish) suited connector hands we have easier time postflop since we can fold one pairs easily, bet all kinds of draws, hit good straights and two pairs with out it being obvious to villian. Only thing I'm conserned is weather we run into a higher flush too often when we do hit. I think it'd be a better 4bet against bb since sb's calling range is going to be stronger, but I still think he'll overfold alot.

So am I wrong in saying that we should have a 4bet bluff range in NL2 and that this hand should be in it?