AQ UTG 4bet bluffing vs 3bet + CC
Posted by KillEV
Posted by
KillEV
posted in
Low Stakes
AQ UTG 4bet bluffing vs 3bet + CC
Blinds: $0.10/$0.25 (6 Players)
BN: $25.85
SB: $31.29
BB: $30.01
UTG: $40.58 (Hero)
MP: $74.57
CO: $25.00
SB: $31.29
BB: $30.01
UTG: $40.58 (Hero)
MP: $74.57
CO: $25.00
Preflop
($0.35)
Hero is UTG with
A
Q
, , , , , , ,
Flop
($15.35)
K
8
5
,
Turn
($15.35)
K
8
5
4
,
River
($15.35)
K
8
5
4
A
, ,
Final Pot
UTG
wins and shows a pair of Aces.
UTG wins $23.90
Rake is $1.13
UTG wins $23.90
Rake is $1.13
No info
Is this ok to 4bet bluff? Should we prefer suited because it is less combos?
I assumed BB's range was {TT-QQ,AQs+,AKo} - I gave him quite a wide range I think... I don't know what it is.
I am very unsure if I should bet out at any point on the flop or turn.
On the river I bet small since I expect him to never have a better hand, and all the rest will have a very hard time calling a larger bet.
Loading 3 Comments...
Offsuit is better as a 4-bet because they don't play as easily post flop. I don't mind the flop check against a passive opponent, would bet a little bigger on the river simply because it's unlikely villain checks AK twice and he can def show up with a lot of weaker aces since it checked down twice, you possibly even get a call from some stubborn JJ/QQ if you're up against a fish.
think c-bet is going to be higher EV than x
looks fine
suited hands have better playabiltiy obv, but this works very nice blockers to his continueing range.
Think this looks pretty good, especially with the coldcaller, nh!
Be the first to add a comment