Are you jamming as a bluff or for value? Because I think maybe you have too much equity to be bluffing with this hand and not enough equity yet to be betting for value. Also, when a guy with a spread like that, even over 38 hands, starts betting and raising, alarm bells go off in my head. He should almost always have a hand that beats us at the moment, so jamming here seems a little gamble-y for the sake of being gamble-y. (I just don't see what worse would call - Any lesser A he has can't have a FD as well, so every hand we're ahead of - and I doubt there are many - has no reason to call.)

I mean, I guess the worst we could be doing is maybe 25% against TT specifically, and we're ok vs. even AA or KK, but it takes a pretty wide range to get up past 60%. Like, 99+, ATs+, AQ+. Plus, there's the  other guy in the pot, too, who probably still has all the sets in his range. I don't know - I think a call might be better? 

(btw - keep playing around with the hand converter, see if you can't get it to work. It's so much easier to have the cards and the reads all together at the top of the page. It took me a few attempts to get it to click, too.)

Its difficult to make a mistake here postflop with a hand with so much equity UNLESS you fold at some point. 

Getting it in on the flop is fine, just from an equity standpoint the question is whether there is an argument for flatting. 

If villain is very aggressive and will continue with his bluffs you could even allow villain to bet the turn too. 

agree with Daz. The only plus I see to shoving the flop is if maybe we get AK to fold, given the guys stats its less likely he has bluffs to continue with, so maybe thats the better way to go, but really just so long as we dont fold we are fine

I think check shove is alright since you're OOP, you're getting your money in good mostly or have great equity don't think c/c is as profitable..

Please 4b this pre.

Polarized whats your reasoning? I'm more than happy with flatting this pre; I'm sure getting AI pre would be profitable too but I think we should be able to extract more ev taking a flop in position vs a player who we have a significant skill advantage on. Do you think the dead money from the CO and the bad relative position sways this?

Meta - I think a shove is the standard and obviously profitable play. I'm thinking a flat call could play out really well too though. CO is going to be tempted to shove with draws when we flat and we are doing real good vs his draws. In the event bb is better than we think post flop he may shove with bluffs on ace or king turns. Just some food for thought.

Doing some quick math on the preflop, giving him a getting it in range of AA-JJ, AK, AQs, and a 3betting range of 10% (so that we are taking the pot down preflop 67% of the time) I am getting a 9bb ev for our preflop 4bet. I instinctively feel we can squeeze more ev post flop. Maybe I am way overestimating this. Also I acknowledge that maybe I am not giving enough weight to him spazzing with ATo or something to a 4bet preflop.

I am not trying to say you are wrong to 4bet preflop, but I still don't see it as clear cut as you seem to, and if you are right that it is clear cut I want to convince myself of this.