AK in CO vs MP
Posted by KatonBond
Posted by
KatonBond
posted in
Low Stakes
AK in CO vs MP
SB: el urraco: $3.93
BB: orcius81: $5.03
UTG: professorSLV: $6.74
MP: KiMmYStaRs: $6.05
CO: Mr.K Bond007: $20.23 (Hero)
IMO, i feel like this is just a spot where im suppose to go broke everytime im beat and i should never fold AK in this spot... but I would appreciate another point of view in this hand. What im having trouble understanding in this hand is I cant seem to put my villain on a bluff or a worse value hand, I guess he can have something like 52 or 54,but would someone really try and bluff me here when i almost always have AJ+ here? Im also having trouble putting my villain on a better value hand.. I expect my villain to raise 77 and 88 and AA(but i block this) preflop, I dont expect him to raise turn with A8... Hes only reppin a 3x or 33 here. Is this a spot where my villain is just wierd and I should just forget about this hand since its rare ill encounter a wierd villain like this guy? What if it was a reg taking this line? What would his range in this spot be? I have seen some people find a fold here, i dont think its a cooler if im beat here but maybe it is? I have no reads on this villain.
Loading 4 Comments...
I would have played the same, but his raise on the turn is really big. Difficult spot if you don't know the player. If you have enough hands played with him check the replayer in PT or HM and look for his bet sizing patterns. May be you'll find some answers.
Thanks for your feedback :)
I'd just fold the river. I don't think he has much worse than a 3 in his range here very often.
You are projecting what you'd do with those hands onto a loose passive player who is probably just randomly clicking buttons. Plus I doubt he ever shows up with 88 in this spot. Maybe 77 or A7 or 33 or A3 or even AA and of course the whole palette of random 3x. I don't think diamonds are in his range either after x/r turn.
If you think he's capable of doing this with AT+AQ which I doubt you can probably hero call otr. I just don't think he'd play AT-AQ that way until proven otherwise.
Ah i see.I appreciate your feedback :)
Be the first to add a comment