AJs on CO 100NL Zoom
Posted by CombatCarl
Posted by
CombatCarl
posted in
Low Stakes
AJs on CO 100NL Zoom
BN: $148.89
SB: $116.22
BB: $100
UTG: $139.68
HJ: $82.52
CO: $221.51 (Hero)
SB: $116.22
BB: $100
UTG: $139.68
HJ: $82.52
CO: $221.51 (Hero)
Preflop
($1.50)
(6 Players)
Hero was dealt
A
J
UTG raises to $3, HJ folds, Hero calls $3, BN folds, SB folds, BB folds
UTG raises to $3, HJ folds, Hero calls $3, BN folds, SB folds, BB folds
Flop
($7.50)
6
3
T
(2 Players)
UTG bets $5.50,
Hero calls $5.50
Turn
($18.50)
6
3
T
K
(2 Players)
UTG bets $13.50,
Hero calls $13.50
River
($45.50)
6
3
T
K
9
(2 Players)
UTG checks,
Hero bets $22
My HUD wasn't working so he is pretty much an unknown player.
I was playing taggish. I was wondering about the prospect of raising turn but it seemed too good to raise if he should be barreling air/worse and getting 3bet could be kind of gross.
Also, what do you think about the bet size when checked to on river?
Loading 15 Comments...
ur bet size is awful
wouldnt raise this specific turn vs UTG, esp when a 2nd FD appears....you´re repping sets and KTs exlusively and UTG has a ton in his range that he can continue with i guess...
@ Nipper: about sizing OTR: weak range by villain equals smaller bets to gain value IMO...So sizing looks good to me
river size is bad
Very decent arguments both of you mentioned :d
you have the nuts and you want to bet big?
Thanks guys, well, he tank folded to my small bet on river so..... I feel like may be smaller size to induce a bluff CR is better.
I doubt you're getting bluff c/r much here. There's not much villain can rep when he takes this line. It may widen his calling range though.
call turn, bet river big. vs a bluff catcher range you want to maximize. hard to see villain turn a pair into a bluff or x/r something hes giving up on
Maximizing vs a bluffcatcher by betting big? Did i miss gto school too often? What range you put villain on here?
if villain is only calling or folding and has all sets, straights, two pairs and AA in his range why would you bet small? We arent blocking any pair combos and if hes folding all one pair or worse hands and calling all better, why would you not bet big?
i dont see there being enough value in squeezing out crying calls from a weak K or 10 over getting in a big bet vs a hand that is calling often.
i dont think this is gto and i do think its exploitable as we do not have that many bluffs in our range (which makes betting smaller better), but i do think it gets called enough to make it worth it
so your basically sayin that villains callingrange is inelastic (what would be the gametheoretical term for your arguments: only calling or folding everything).
But your also mentioning a lot of hands that could or could not call a riverbet (what would be an elastic calling range: so relying on the betsizing)
And im pretty sure that villain has a wide enough calling range that there is a decent part (2pairs/sets mostly) that dont neccessary call a huge riverbet, but a small to middleish
Btw has OP no info on villain, so i wouldnt even assume that he couldnt find a call with a bare K (even though that would be fishy as hell, cauze as you mentioned we dont really have many bluffs in our range)
Im pretty sure villain will call any betsize with a straight or flush (what also could be wrong btw!)
But even from a combinatorical POV there is obv more 2p/set combos than straights and flushes in villains range even though hes raising UTG
So, from a GTO-perspective, we in general should be betting smaller vs elastic callingranges with the nuts and im pretty sure that villain has an elastic calling range on this board
Bet sizing is fine.
crazy: 3 ppl say good size ,3ppl say bad size.Wtf?
+1 to bad sizing!
raoul,
lets give him range for calling 22
all sets, straights, 2x K10s combos and some flush combos (doesnt have to be many) maybe AA and maaaaaaaaybe AK but i think this range is being way to generous...
his range for calling a bigger bet (35-45)
all sets, straights, 2x K10s combos (most of time), and some flushes
pretty inelastic looking to me, the smaller bet gets called by speculative hands that in all honestly have no business calling ever anyways.
to be fair i think all your theory is good and i agree mostly, i just think your range for villain getting to the river and then calling any bet is way to wide.
this is definately exploitable but i dont think players are folding enough on this river vs any bet size (my experience at this limit)
-good discussion though
Be the first to add a comment