Bet>c/r>c/c If he checks back you loose a ton of value either on the turn or river. This is top of your range here. I mean would you check QQ here as well?

WHy would you Pot control on T(s) turn card, when it brings so many FD/OESD/Gutshots into the mix. I think checking AJo OTT is a mistake, in terms of evaluating VIllains overall range, youre missing so much value by not Betting your AJo OTT for equity protection+Value.

RIver: I'm leaning towards a Call, given VIllain should have a decent % of Bluffs in his river Jamming range.

Hard to see any hands in villains range that have zero sdv and need to bluff, lots of missed Tx str8 draws are potential winners versus our weak line.

Maybe bet ~$6 on the river and fold to a raise. I mean villain can't perceive any fold equity here right.

Gross spot. May play out easier if we check flop? What does flop bet achieve?

I'm not a fan of pre, I think AJo is a tad too weak to 3bet for value here given villain's strategy.  A better strategy is to 3bet something like AQs+,QQ maybe JJ, and then an appropriate amount of bluffs.  Note that if he's defending often to your 3bets, his flop range becomes weaker, making your flop c-bets more successful on average.

I noticed you said on turn you decided to pot control vs a tight range.  I think the major logic flaw here is if villain's range is already tight on the flop and then you bet and he calls, now you've just made his range even tighter.  It seems a little schizophrenic to me to say "Oh, I can bet this hand on the flop for value against a tight range" then on the turn say "whoa his range is pretty strong now, I better check and pot control."  An alternative way to approach this spot is to ask yourself "can I get 3 streets of value with this hand?" if so, go b/b/b on good run-offs.  If not, consider checking flop and bluff catching, or betting tu and river for value after flop checks through.

On to the river:

So for value he has {JTs(2), 88(3), TT(3)} if he's defending close to optimally.  If he's a bit wider he could potentially have a few 44/Q9s/97s combos in there too since your a bit deeper to start the hand.  I think we should add a few of those, so lets say 6 combos of that.  So total value combos: 14

For bluffs, he can have hands like 56s(3), 67s(3), KQs(3), potentially some 55-77 combos.

So if we say he's bluffing ~9/23 that means he's bluffing ~39% of the time.  He only needs to be bluffing 34% of the time for this to be a call.  He only needs to have ~7.5 bluff combos in order to make calling good.  Given that coupled with the fact your probably near the top of your range calling seems like the play.

Also for calling river favours Jof spades in your hand which reduce a lot of value combos in flushes at the villains range

And also for turn play: if u XC this turn your hand is face up as 1 pair hand in opponents eyes

Any way I did call (my first instinct was to fold vs this particular player and hence why I made the thread) and he did have 88 for a set.