AA in a 4bet Pot HU
Posted by Sebastian
Posted by
Sebastian
posted in
Low Stakes
AA in a 4bet Pot HU
The question is regarding the turn. Though I feel jamming is fine here, I felt that since a safe card fell, checking was better for several reasons. Given the range that I assigned to him, I felt that when he only called the flop, that his hand was either a float or a worse pair, plus because I have the Ad as a blocker, it limits his FD's to KdQd which I feel would also be raising the flop. If he did have an overpair or set that he was just calling, I thought he would certainly be jamming this on the turn anyway, So all the a bet would accomplish would be to fold out all his floats and weaker pairs that peeled one.
Conversely, by checking, I felt like it allowed for him to bluff his floats, and maybe even turn his weaker pairs into bluffs when I check. If he did check back, I thought that I could bet about a little less than half pot making it easy for him to bluff catch as I wasn't worried about giving a free card here as if I was ahead, he would at most be drawing to 6 outs or less ie if he peeled with KQ or a worse pair with the exception of KcQc. Thoughts?
IPoker, $0.25/$0.50 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 6 Players
BB: $50.75 (101.5 bb)
UTG: $12.71 (25.4 bb)
MP: $23.83 (47.7 bb)
Hero (CO): $62.63 (125.3 bb)
BTN: $207.71 (415.4 bb)
SB: $51.87 (103.7 bb)
Preflop: Hero is CO with Ad As
2 folds, Hero raises to $1.50, BTN raises to $4, 2 folds, Hero raises to $9, BTN calls $5
Flop: ($18.75) Td 6c Jd (2 players)
Hero bets $10, BTN calls $10
Turn: ($38.75) 4c (2 players)
Hero checks, BTN bets $188.71 and is all-in, Hero calls $43.63 and is all-in
River: ($126.01) Ac (2 players, 2 are all-in)
Loading 3 Comments...
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.
This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.