I think this is a very interesting spot. I feel like villain has something like this range + a little wider, but not too much wider because I did open utg+2.

QQ-22,AKo-AQo,AJs,KQs-KJs,QJs,JTs

Vs this range, Hero has 54.40% equity.

Basically I think that is a lot of equity for Hero to c/f, so I don't really want to c/f. So let's look at the other options. If Hero bets, you get villain to fold broadways which you have 24% equity vs or smaller pp's that you are crushing. You get called by 9 combos of sets and 24 combos of QQ-99 which is approximately 32% of his range. So basically if you bet the flop, you make yourself isolated with better hands a whole lot. If you c/c, then villain still has 45.6% equity vs you assuming he's betting all hands. He might be checking back 55-33 and some A high, which hurts Hero planning to c/c. Also, even though Hero has 54% equity right now, the amount of Realizable equity for Hero is probably much lower. It will be hard for Hero to continue to a turn bet on almost any card. So, therefore, I'm now thinking this hand should just be a c/f. C/r'ing seems alright if you think villain is capable of folding an overpair some portion to a turn bet, but c'r'ing doesn't seem too attractive for the same reasons I don't care for betting. What do you guys think?