600NL - Starting Tables HU and facing Turn decision
Posted by Zizek
Posted by
Zizek
posted in
Mid Stakes
600NL - Starting Tables HU and facing Turn decision
Hand#3252011625000251 - Halifax (6-max) 11625 -- $3/$6 NL Hold'em -- 2013/03/01 - 01:22:18
Dealer: Seat 10
Seat 3: Villain ($1,591.14 in chips)
Seat 10: Hero ($605.50 in chips)
Hero: posts small blind $3
Villain: posts big blind $6
Dealt to Hero [As,9c]
Hero: raises to $12
Villain: raises to $54
Hero: calls $42
*** FLOP *** [4s,9h,Ts]
Villain: bets $72
Hero: calls $72
*** TURN *** [5h]
Villain: checks
Hero: bets $126
Villain: is all in $1,465.14
Hero: is all in $353.50
Villain: returns uncalled bet $985.64
Villain: shows [Qd Js]
Hero: shows [As 9c]
*** RIVER *** [7d]
***SHOW DOWN***
Hero wins $1,210.50 with Pair of Nines
Have played a fair bit w/ villain HU/6max he is quite aggressive and tend to 3bet/barrel quite wide and polarized. He's the type who is much more likely to bet a marginal strength hand than to pot control/bluff catch. He 3bets a quite wide and polarized (likely 20-30% HU) range. Pre and flop play themselves IMO, but I'm curious to hear thoughts on the merits of bet/calling turn as opposed to checking turn and possibly bluff catching river.
What would your standard turn line be vs an unknown and vs different player types? Thanks :)
Loading 5 Comments...
I feel like a lot of people are really imbalanced w/ this line, at least early in a match, so b/ca seems good/std.
Board: 4s 9s Th 5h
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 43.070% 42.72% 00.36% 2105 17.50 { As9c }
Hand 1: 56.930% 56.57% 00.36% 2788 17.50 { 99+, 55-44, AhKh, AhQh, AhJh, ATs, Ah9h, KTs+, QJs, 87s, 76s, ATo, KTo, QJo, 87o, 76o }
Of course we could add some more value hands and substract some of the weaker draw combos, but we´re doing better than I initially thought and by bet calling we´re also balancing our floating / betting turn range. nh.
Be the first to add a comment