Villain has 3bet 6/26 of my opens but I haven't seen him showdown anything unreasonable. ATo BTN vs CO, in another hand he played postflop a lot like a weak ace, and one time he folded to a 4bet. What is my 4bet range meant to be here? I think it would be really fascinating to see a Sauce HU video where they play with positions reversed so that it simulates the SB-BB dynamic in 6-max or full-ring.

I'm guessing I'll 4bet linear and around 7-8% of hands. Something like 88+, AQ+, ATs+, KQs, QJs, JTs. I don't know what I'm meant to be doing to stop my calling range from being extremely weak if that's the case though.

Board mostly misses me but I have plenty of hands with showdown value. I'm guessing I'm meant to cbet some AK to balance my bdfds with the few SCs I 4bet and x/c most of my aces to protect my pocket pairs.

This call seems awful in retrospect, this is the rock-bottom of my range, even the SCs which gave up flop are better than it. I think I was thinking about his range as though it was his 3betting range and forgetting that he also called a 4bet so his range was much tighter than that.

Thought really really hard about bluff jamming this river. What do you think? It's possible for me to have clubs with AT or AQ and possible for me to have KK, so with 5 combos like that I'm probably meant to be jamming this hand which I showed up with here because of my stupid turn call.