50 NL ZOOM: Turn check raise
Posted by chasing_paper
Posted by
chasing_paper
posted in
Low Stakes
50 NL ZOOM: Turn check raise
BN: $67.55
SB: $54.80
BB: $146.24 (Hero)
UTG: $61.03
HJ: $125.31
CO: $68.59
SB: $54.80
BB: $146.24 (Hero)
UTG: $61.03
HJ: $125.31
CO: $68.59
Preflop
($0.75)
(6 Players)
Hero was dealt
2
A
UTG raises to $1.50, HJ folds, CO folds, BN folds, SB folds, Hero calls $1
UTG raises to $1.50, HJ folds, CO folds, BN folds, SB folds, Hero calls $1
Flop
($3.25)
9
8
K
(2 Players)
Hero checks,
UTG bets $1.50,
Hero calls $1.50
Turn
($6.25)
9
8
K
T
(2 Players)
Hero checks,
UTG bets $4,
Hero raises to $12.28
Villain: 24/20 EP RFI= 20, c-bet= 60, Tcbet= 53
is this a good spot to checkraise Turn? cause i think we got, if not more then villain QJ in our range here, + all sets (88,99,TT) exept KK.
Loading 9 Comments...
I think your problem with check raising is that you are forced to turn your hand into a bluff 75% of the time on the river. Assuming it doesn't run a club you now have te initiative and have to play back or come across as really week ( I assume you have no check raising river range here). Which means you are better to just call and then bet out on the river on any club or q, j or 7
I raise flop instead of turn.
As played I probably just call turn and lead 7's, J's, Q's, and all clubs.
If you are c/ring this turn I think you have to follow threw on a lot of rivers but its tough. Also if he jams turn that's a disaster for you so I don't like raising turn here.
i think on a such drawy board you are going to c/r your sets!
Everybody happy with the call pre?
I also make this call, but sometimes wonder how +EV it is.
I prefer to 3bet pre vd UTG here. Too often our ace is actually a reverse implied out. You want to sort that situation out early
I think call the turn will be ok, and if there is no club in river, hero can still makie check raise bluff. But for a reg, I will like bluff the river.
Actually I will bet the flop,turn directly.
Blah, i think we should fold pre o 3bet this hand. We are OOP and have a lot of reverse implied odds against the UTG range, also when we 3bet BBvsUTG 120bbs efective he is going to 4bet with a very narrow range most of the time + we balance our 3bet range pre bbVSutg. Asplayed ch/r flop is better imo
I'd choose between 3b and folding PF, not a big fan of calling with such a hand vs 20%.
I also think that XR the F is better. It's a dreally drawy board and not one that Villain is going to bluff barrel particularily often.
As played, how about leading T+R? I think that most of his range is now likely to XB, but might call a bet only to fold the R most of the time. I would also play all my sets/straights/2pairs this way in order to deny him free equity, which he is going to go for pretty often imo. I'd even consider overbetting the R if I do that, knowing that he's capped his range and my range is polarized.
a2s is not great to call, even though it has great equity against kk/aa, we can barely never feel comfortable playing on Axx and our kicker always is bottom pair, also, the straights that this hand makes are easily outdrawn. A3-A4-A5 are better because you can x/r gutter+ndfd more often. :D
as played, no reason to x/r ott since he increases the bet sizing and x/r K high boards against UTG range is not good
Be the first to add a comment