5-5 premature jam or +ev jam
Posted by raiser_burn
Posted by
raiser_burn
posted in
Mid Stakes
5-5 premature jam or +ev jam
Hero (BTN) - $1700
(SB) - $1200
Villian (BB) - $850
Villian has been playing relatively tight, but is capable of playing back at you, (sb) is very maniacal and opens all (btn). (sb) hasn't been 3 betting too much oop
Hero - 6h7h opens for 25
sb calls
villian calls
Flop
6c6d5c
hero leads for 45
sb folds
villian (bb) x/r to 150, hero calls
Turn
3s
villian (bb) bets 325
hero calls
this is where i feel like I played the hand wrong. In retrospect I think a jam here is better then a call. Villians perceived range is all flush draws, pp 77-10 maybe JJ at best, and all 6x's. I don't feel like he is x/r'ing with a flopped boat here. At the time I felt he was weighted more towards a pp so I did not want to make it tough for him on the turn, and was going to jam all non club rivers, making it looked like i missed, but I regret not jamming simply because if he had a FD he was committed to call, If he has a pp he may or may not call and with any 6x i am basically losing too. Only beating 64 and 62 both very not likely. But I feel that even if he has a 6x I still have some equity in the hand as oppose to a tough spot on river where my equity is 0.
River
Js
Villian jams for $350
Hero after some long thought called cause of the price. Getting slightly over 4-1
Villian shows ks6s
now my question is as played can I fold this river for the price I am getting? Very likely he has 6x now after jamming river or even JJ, don't see him jamming less for value. Maybe a small chance he's trying to push me off thinking i missed my draw.
would jamming the turn been a better play considering stack sizes?
now what if we were deeper, what would be optimal on the turn then?
I appreciate your response
Loading 17 Comments...
There are two possible advantages that come to my mind that would make shoving turn better:
1) We could get Villain paying off with a flush draw where he might x/f the river when missed - but I think that´s unlikely to happen in that combination, either he doesn´t have the fd or he´ll likely fire away anyways (his last chance to win the pot).
2) We prevent from getting bluffed on the river. That would demand though that we´re folding to a rivershove - which won´t happen.
I think I d feel worse jamming and getting smashed by K6 because I made a bad play that isolated myself vs better and shut down his potential for bluffing. :D
BigFiszh - after I flat pretty much pot, do you really believe that he jams river with his entire range? I was the preflop raiser and made it to the river with him. I am pretty strong after flatting the turn. And hes not a terrible player. If that is the case then I don't mind just calling the turn. But if hes checking back all busted fd and x/c or c/f his pp then I prefer the turn jam
As I said, it´s more a fold than a jam for me. If you still disagree, let´s make a model. Come up with a range for him and we´ll construct an EV-calculation for jamming vs. calling.
Hey bigfish, as far as inputting the villains range, I thing the OP's perceived range seems pretty spot on, lets try that and see what the calculation says? I'm interested, thanks.
(I think we need to consider adding 78 to his range)
fd - we can probably discount about half of them (i.e 26, 39, J2, etc.)
6x
PP - 77-JJ, I feel like hes 3betting QQ+ 100% of time, so we will leave those out.
78 off
Jamming ev?
Calling ev?
and im curious as to what our calling ev is on the river. considering to variables i guess
1) he never jams his busted draws
2) he jams his entire range
JJ-55,A6s,K6s,Q6s,J6s,T6s,96s,86s,76s,KcQc,KcJc,QcJc,AcTc,KcTc,QcTc,JcTc,Ac9c,Kc9c,Qc9c,Jc9c,Tc9c,Ac8c,Kc8c,Qc8c,Jc8c,Tc8c,9c8c,Ac7c,Kc7c,Qc7c,Jc7c,Tc7c,9c7c,8c7c,Ac5c,Kc5c,Ac4c,Kc4c,Ac3c,Kc3c,Ac2c,Kc2c,62o+
That´s all 6x, JJ-77, 55, and a ton of flush draw combos for a total of 80 combos.
Let´s further assume, once we jam the turn:
- he´s not folding any 6x (20 combos)
- he´s folding roughly 75% of his overpairs (21 of 30 combos)
- he´s folding 50% of his flush draws, because he can´t profitably call with a naked flush draw (15 of 30 combos)
If we check the turn, he´s shoving the river with:
- 100% of his better 6x (18 combos)
- 100% of his worse 6x (2 combos)
- 100% of his flushes on club river (30 combos)
- 50% of his busted draws on non-club river (15 of 30 combos)
- 0% of his overpairs on club-river (0 of 30 combos)
- 25% of his overpairs on non-club river (9 of 30 combos)
He´s x/f the rest.
Say, we´re calling any non-club-river (except 7c).
Ok, let´s compare the EV.
If we shove (675), the total pot after him calling will be 1725, we have ~62% against his calling-range:
EV (jam) = 0.62*1725 - 675 = +394.50
Now let´s compare the more difficult spot of us calling. Three scenarios happening:
a) flush card hits - Villain shoves 6x / flush / better, we fold
b) flush card hits - Villain checks overpairs, we check
c) blank hits - Villain shoves (busted draws, overpairs, 6x), we call
d) blank hits - Villain checks, we check
How often do those scenarios happen?
Scenario a) happens in 15% (flush card hits) * 50/80 = 9%.
Scenario b) happens in 15% * 30/80 = 6%.
Scenario c) happens in 85% * 44/80 = 47%.
Scenario d) happens in 85% * 36/80 = 38%.
In scenario a) we´re folding and lose our turncall (325). In scenario b) we win 100% and win turn-pot plus turnbet from Villain (375+325=700). In scenario c) we win the turn-pot plus turn- and riverbet from Villain (375+325+350=1050) in 26/44 (60%) and lose our turn- and riverbet (325+350=675) in 18/44 (40%), in scenario d) we win the turn-pot plus Villains turnbet (375+325=700) in 100%.
Let´s construct the EV-calculation:
EV (check) = (0.09 * -325) + (0.06 * +700) + (0.47 * ((0.6 * 1050) + (0.4 * -675))) + (0.38 * 700)
EV (check) = +447.95
OK, that´s what I got. I did NOT manipulate anything in my assumptions to get a "positive" result or to prove that I´m right. I just made the assumptions and then calculated the result. And it seems that flatting the turn actually yields an EV-difference of almost 10bb. That´s not gigantic, but it´s significant.
Now, let me know if you disagree with any of my assumptions (and why) or if I made any mistakes in my calculation (hopefully not, but I did not doublecheck it, so chances are good :D).
EDIT: But all that said - I kinda disagree with the given range (although I took it as the base for my calculation). This is a live game, not online. There´s no digital information showing the size of the pot - there´s just a mountain of chips in the middle and Villain (if he´s good) can roughly estimate the size of the pot from the bets that went in on previous streets. And most live players, even live regulars (!) tend to choose a betsize that feels correct for the situation in absolute terms - not in relation to the pot.
So 325 is just a gigantic bet for a 5-5-game. This most likely is far more often a bet designed to protect a good hand than a bet to bluff Hero off a good hand. So I´d massively reduce the drawing-combos from his range, leaving a range that´s far more 6x-heavy than most of you possibly assumed - and making flatting even more better than shoving (as it already was against his draw-heavy range). Hence why I mentioned that folding would be closer than jamming (not that I suggested folding - I just said that fold > shove).
Be the first to add a comment