44 set on dry board
Posted by Cozacu
Posted by
Cozacu
posted in
Low Stakes
44 set on dry board
UTG: $10.96
HJ: $9.89
CO: $10
BN: $10 (Hero)
SB: $16.02
BB: $10.62
HJ: $9.89
CO: $10
BN: $10 (Hero)
SB: $16.02
BB: $10.62
Preflop
($0.15)
(6 Players)
Hero was dealt
4
4
UTG raises to $0.20, HJ raises to $0.40, CO folds, Hero calls $0.40, SB raises to $2, BB folds, UTG calls $1.80, HJ folds, Hero calls $1.60
UTG raises to $0.20, HJ raises to $0.40, CO folds, Hero calls $0.40, SB raises to $2, BB folds, UTG calls $1.80, HJ folds, Hero calls $1.60
Flop
($6.55)
T
4
3
(3 Players)
SB checks,
UTG checks,
Hero checks
Turn
($6.55)
T
4
3
J
(3 Players)
SB bets $3.80,
UTG folds,
Hero raises to $8, and is all in,
SB calls $4.20
Sb 22/20 af 3.5 3b SB 14.3 / SQ 0 136 hands
UTG 100/36 30 hands
PF = Is my PF call correct?
Flop = standard on that dry board, wanting to let them catch something, especially UTG
Turn = not much left to do but shove.
1.Do you agree with PF call?
2.Would you play the hand differently post-flop if you called PF?
Loading 13 Comments...
I would fold preflop after the first 3bet. As played it's fine.
i think the oddas for hitting a set is 7:1. So you lose 7x 1,60= 11,20 and win 1x 10 Dollar. So its a losingplay. There is a rule of thumb, that says, wenn need 20x of preflopraise, to make the play profitable. For instance somebody raises to 0,30 (x20) =6 Dollar. So if he or we have 6 Dollar left in our stack, than the play is profitable. The reason for that is, if you hit your set, you are not going to stack villain every time.
I know the rule, but that is HU, here we have a 3rd player in the hand who could stackoff lightly.
that is HU where we have a third player? Do you mean Heads Up? And then, when he stacks of light, what is, you dont have the odds!
I meant the rule 20/call is for the scenarios where you are heads`up. Which here is clearly not the case. With a 3rd player in the hand (who will stack off lightly) your implied odds are larger... you could effectively win 200BB if you stack of both players. Although that is highly unlikely your implied odds should be much better than when you are facing a HU situation, where calling PF is by far a loosing play.
But you have to take into account that SB,BB & UTG can still 4bet and then you just burn away money.
ok, forget the 20 Rule. The odds for hitting a set is 7:1. You lose 7x 2 Dollar , and win 1 time 12 Dollar ,i think, you can calculate it for yourself
knoxox good point. I agree folding PF is much better here.
You`re putting dead money on the table when cold calling here, so fold pre.
As played bet the flop.
I'd also fold pre. As played, it's fine.
I think the fold pre is a good play. Assuming we get to the flop, I'm okay with a check for deception due to the flop being rainbow. If the flop had 2 to a suit I'd lean more towards betting flop for value and protection. I like the turn shove. If another heart shows up on the river we might make more mistakes such as folding to bluffs. Due to SB 4bet size I'd mainly be concerned about a set over set situation with JJ or slowplayed TT being a concern. If SB shows up with JJ or TT your equity is ~3% which would be a disaster.
If SB calls with a heart draw you have between 85% and 70% equity which seems fine to shove.
I think the way you played it prevents you from making mistakes with your hand. I like the post flop play.
Fold pre, after the flop plays itself. Did you get abused in the chatbox and that's why you've posted?
No. I posted because I was nut sure if the PF decision was fine or not.
Be the first to add a comment