3bet Pot OOP vs a Standard Reg 100NL
Posted by Sebastian
Posted by
Sebastian
posted in
Low Stakes
3bet Pot OOP vs a Standard Reg 100NL
BN: $40.85
SB: $100.50 (Hero)
BB: $23.50
UTG: $47.35
HJ: $194.40
CO: $38.90
SB: $100.50 (Hero)
BB: $23.50
UTG: $47.35
HJ: $194.40
CO: $38.90
Preflop
($1.50)
(6 Players)
Hero was dealt
A
A
UTG folds, HJ raises to $2, CO folds, BN folds, Hero raises to $7, BB folds, HJ calls $5
UTG folds, HJ raises to $2, CO folds, BN folds, Hero raises to $7, BB folds, HJ calls $5
Flop
($15.50)
9
K
8
(2 Players)
I was having a discussion with my buddy about cbetting here. Though he was very comfortable with a cbet, he preferred checking here. Thoughts?
Loading 2 Comments...
What is the reasoning your buddy gave for checking? Seems like villain will simply check back a lot of hands that he would call at least once with. Villain might even decide to take a free card with a flush draw here fearing the check raise.
your Buddy wanted to check-raise, check-call...or check-fold?
If he has a lot of AJ AQ TT JJ QQ in his 3bet range that he check on this flop, it might be a good thing to check AA here to protect the checking range. Still vilain got to be the kind of vilain that attack missed cbet and you need to be skilled enough to not get exploit on the turn and river when he check nack to be a real HERO!
Be the first to add a comment