3 bet pot vs laggy player IP 200nl
Posted by WM2K
Posted by
WM2K
posted in
Mid Stakes
3 bet pot vs laggy player IP 200nl
BB: $215
UTG: $200
HJ: $219.25
CO: $210.15
BN: $243.05 (Hero)
SB: $468.45
UTG: $200
HJ: $219.25
CO: $210.15
BN: $243.05 (Hero)
SB: $468.45
Preflop
($3.00)
(6 Players)
Hero was dealt
Q
8
UTG folds, CO folds, Hero raises to $4, SB raises to $13, BB folds, Hero calls $9
UTG folds, CO folds, Hero raises to $4, SB raises to $13, BB folds, Hero calls $9
Flop
($29.00)
4
J
T
(3 Players)
SB checks,
Hero bets $17,
SB calls $17
Turn
($63.00)
4
J
T
3
(3 Players)
SB checks,
Hero bets $48,
SB calls $48
River
($159.00)
4
J
T
3
2
(3 Players)
SB checks
Loading 8 Comments...
As played river looks like a bet, but we are getting looked up by hands like KcTx and J8 some of the time.
I also don't like how our flop and turn sizing changes. Yes, it sets up a river jam to bomb the turn but it also looks a little bluffy and will start to polarize our value betting range in villains eyes. If we just bet in the 50-66% pot range we can bet the same size on the river and it lets us really rep all the Jx better. We don't always have to be sizing up for stacks in 3b pots.
When villian goes c/c OTF he almost always have a madehand and you then have to decide whether you are going 3streets or you give up.
It would be nice if you added some more stats.
You have to make some assumptions:
- How often is he gonna be c/c Jx OTF (I would not assume he folds that).
- How often he has Tx (Tx is what you would aim to fold if you 3barrel).
Another thing to point out is that you probably dont have as many valuecombos in your perceived range as you actually have (I assume you flat all Axs when you flat Q8s.) Besides that you have a lot of go to bluffing combos in your perceived bluffing range "KQ&AQ" which usually is greenflag to calldown with a bluffcatcher for a loose guy.
Turn feels like a dreamspot to actually have a flush which makes me wanna shutdown at turn.
Be the first to add a comment